Table 3.

Divergence time estimates. Results of relative divergence time estimates from G‐PhoCS analyses, including the median and 95% HPD interval. Other columns indicate a range of divergence time estimates (in bold) calibrated from different datasets (Tollis, Glor, Campbell‐Staton) and methodologies (see 3). All other values—within Anolis carolinensis—are based on these calibrations and the relative divergence estimates (median) from G‐PhoCS. All G‐PhoCS values are relative estimates, and all other values are in millions of years before present

Divergence	G‐PhoCS	Tollis (2012)	Glor (2005)	Campbell‐Staton (2012)
1. Gulf‐Atl, Carolinas	2.01 (1.51–2.66)	0.97 (0.79–1.18)	1.05 (0.86–1.28)	1.92 (1.57–2.35)
2. Group 1 + E. Florida	2.78 (2.30–3.39)	1.34 (1.21–1.51)	1.45 (1.31–1.63)	2.66 (2.40–2.99)
3. Group 2 + N.W. Florida	2.80 (2.32–3.41)	1.35 (1.22–1.52)	1.46 (1.32–1.64)	2.68 (2.42–3.01)
4. Group 3 + S. Florida	6.64 (5.88–7.31)	3.20 (3.09–3.25)	3.46 (3.34–3.52)	6.35 (6.13–6.45)
5. Anolis porcatus + Anolis carolinensis	12.87 (11.80–13.93)	6.2	6.7	12.3