Table 4.

Logistic Regression: Intervention Change Status, ADOS Severity Score, and Rating Items at T1

Rating item	pOR for ADOS severity	95% CI	p	pOR for rating item	95% CI	p
Supported	1.25	[0.91, 1.71]	.18	1.73	[0.84, 3.57]	.13
Sustainability	1.11	[0.78, 1.57]	.58	3.70	[1.24, 11.0]	.019
Scaffolding	1.30	[0.94, 1.79]	.12	2.30	[0.94, 5.58]	.067
Fluency	1.22	[0.88, 1.71]	.24	3.62	[1.20, 11.0]	.023
Coordinated	1.18	[0.84, 1.68]	.34	14.1	[1.54, 129]	.019

Note. Intervention change status (increased-intervention coded 1) was regressed on the ADOS severity score and each rating item. Partial odds ratios (pOR) are shown. The pOR for rating item was reciprocated to transform values less than 1 to values greater than 1; consequently higher values for its pOR indicate that higher values for the rating item score were associated with an increased likelihood of being in the no-change group.