Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 24;12(6):1207–1213. doi: 10.5114/aoms.2015.51177

Table II.

Comparison of electrocardiographic and echocardiographic findings between groups

Parameter MHT (n = 72) Control (n = 40) P-value
LVH (based on ECG), present/absent, N 34/38 3/37 < 0.001***
IVST [mm]* 1.23 ±0.12 0.92 ±0.14 < 0.001**
PWT [mm]* 1.17 ±0.10 0.90 ±0.11 < 0.001**
RWT [mm]* 0.43 ±0.06 0.39 ±0.6 > 0.05**
LV mass [g] 193.23 ±12.21 165.42 ±10.42 < 0.001**
LV mass index**** 103.57 ±7.24 86.73 ±8.75 < 0.001**
EF (%) 59.11 ±9.21 61.21 ±11.24 > 0.05**
LVDD, present/absent, N 25/47 5/35 < 0.001***
E/A ratio 0.91 ±0.15 1.21 ±1.02 < 0.001**

LVH – left ventricular hypertrophy, IVST – interventricular septum, EF – ejection fraction, LVDD – left ventricle diastolic dysfunction, PWT – posterior wall thickness, RWT – right ventricular wall thickness.

*

Mean ± standard deviation

**

p-value is based on one-way ANOVA test

***

p-value is based on chi-square test or Fisher’s exact test as appropriate.

****

LVH defined as LV mass index of > 116.0 in men and > 104.0 in women.