Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 31;40(7):544–557. doi: 10.1002/gepi.21997

Table 1.

Estimated type I error rates at α=0.05 and α=0.01 and power at q=0.1 for the simulation study detailed in Section 3.2.2

Type I Error Rate Power (q=0.1)
Method
α=0.05
α=0.01
Model 1 Model 2
One step 0.051 0.010 0.019 Inline graphic 0.061 Inline graphic
Screening testing, marginal assoc. filter 0.052 0.011 0.381 Inline graphic 0.244 Inline graphic
Screening testing, gene‐env. correl. filter 0.051 0.010 0.000 Inline graphic 0.590 Inline graphic
SPUR, marginal assoc. filter 0.062 0.013 0.697 Inline graphic 0.312 Inline graphic
SPUR, gene‐env. correl. filter 0.057 0.012 0.000 Inline graphic 0.665 Inline graphic
SPUR, hierarchical FDR NAa NAa 0.659 Inline graphic 0.636 Inline graphic
SPUR, global NAa NAa 0.903 Inline graphic 0.828 Inline graphic
a

These SPUR variants reflect the results from FDR or hierarchical FDR control so lack comparable type I error control values.