Skip to main content
. 2016 Aug 11;38(10):1027–1037. doi: 10.1002/bies.201600060

Table 1.

Overview and outcome of potential conflicts over host manipulation between parasites

Host Parasite 1 Parasite 2 Outcome of the conflict Ref.
Species Aim Manipulationa Proposed mechanisms Species Aim Manipulation a Proposed mechanisms
Conflict between parasites with different definitive hosts
Gammaruspulex (amphipod)N Pomphorhynchuslaevis (Acanthocephala) TT to fish PE: strongly reduced photophobia Immune system, neuromodulation, serotonin 101 Polymorphus minutus (Acanthocephala) TT to birds PE: Increased vertical distribution, slightly reduced photophobia Immune system, neuromodulation, serotonin 101 Intermediate vertical distribution, P. laevis dominates reaction to light 55
Paracalliopefluviatili (amphipod)N Acanthocephalusgalaxii (Acanthocephala) TT to fish PE: reduced photophobia Immune system, neuromodulation, serotonin 101 Microphallus sp. (Trematoda) TT to birds None No clear differences between singly infected hosts 87
Batillariaattramentaria (mollusc)N Cercariabatillariae (Trematoda) Transmission of cercariae to fish Habitat change to much lower depths Unknown Renicolidae (Trematoda) Transmission of cercariae to snails Habitat change to slightly lower depths Unknown Intermediate habitat change 56
Rattusnorvegicus (mamal)E Toxoplasma gondii (Protozoa) TT to felines Partially altered activity Brain damage, dopamine, testosterone 102 Toxocaracanis (Nematoda) TT to canids Partially decreased activity Debilitation 103 No clear differences between singly infected hosts 58
Mus musculus (mamal)E Toxoplasma gondii (Protozoa) TT to felines Partially altered activity Brain damage, dopamine, testosterone 102 Toxocaracanis (Nematoda) TT to canids None, but see 104 Debilitation 103 No clear differences between singly infected hosts 57
Conflict between different transmission strategies (i.e. trophic transmission vs. growth and reproduction on/ in the current host)
Gammarusinsensibilis (amphipod)NE Microphalluspapillorobustus (Trematoda) TT to birds PE: more risk prone reaction to disturbance Immune system, neuromodulation, serotonin 101 Gammarinemagammari (Nematoda) Ectoparasitic lifestyle None Hosts naturally infected with more G. gammari less manipulated, but not experimentally inducible 60
Gammarusroeseli (amphipod)N P. minutus (Acanthocephala) TT to birds PE: strongly increased vertical distribution Immune system, neuromodulation, serotonin 101 Dictyocoelasp (Microsporidae) Vertical transmission Slightly increased vertical distribution Unknown Coinfections resembleDictyocoelasp. infected hosts 59
Intraspecific conflict between different developmental stages (i.e. trophic transmission vs. growth and development in the current host)
Caecidotea intermedius (isopod)N Acanthocephalusdirus (infective) (Acanthocephala), TT to fish PE: colour change Carotenoid based colouration of the parasite 105 A. dirus (not‐yet infective) Growth and development Slight colour change Carotenoid based colouration of the parasite 105 Co‐infections resemble hosts with infective parasites 61
G. pulex NE P. laevis (infective) (Acanthocephala), TT to fish PE: reduced photophobia Immune system, neuromodulation, serotonin 101 P. laevis (not‐yet infective) Growth and development None 73 Infective stages dominates, trend for slight effect of the not‐yet infective stage 63
Macrocyclops albidus (copepod)E Schistocephalus solidus (infective) (Cestoda), TT to fish None, but see 39, 65, 106 Unknown S. solidus (not‐yet infective) Growth and development PS: Reduced activity Unknown Infective stage dominates, no effect of one or multiple not yet infective stages 64
M. albidus E Camalanus lacustris (infective) (Nematoda), TT to fish PE: slightly increased activity, slightly reduced recovery time Unknown C. lacustris (not‐yet infective) Growth and development PS: Reduced activity, increased recovery time Unknown Infective stage dominates, no effect of one not yet infective stages 40
Gasterosteus aculeates (fish)E S. solidus (infective) (Cestoda), TT to birds PE: increased risk taking Brain monoamines 107, energy drain 76, 108 S. solidus (not‐yet infective) Growth and development None No clear differences between singly infected hosts, mixed infections increase risk taking beyond infective parasites 76
Interspecific conflict between different developmental stages (i.e. trophic transmission vs. growth and development in the current host)
M. albidus E C. lacustris (infective) (Nematoda), TT to fish PE: slightly increased activity, slightly reduced recovery time Unknown S. solidus (not‐yet infective) Growth and development PS: Reduced activity and increased recovery time Unknown Infective stage dominates, no effect of one not yet infective stages 40
M. albidus E S. solidus (infective) (Cestoda), TT to fish None, but see 39, 65, 106 Unknown C. lacustris (not‐yet infective) Growth and development PS: Reduced activity and increased recovery time Unknown Both parasites affect host behaviour 40

N, Natural infections; E, Experimental infections; PE, Predation enhancement; PS, Predation suppression; TT, Trophic transmission.

a

Only host manipulation observed by the study investigating the conflict. For many host‐parasite systems host manipulation of the same or other traits has been shown by other studies.