. 2016 Nov 15;7:1722. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01722

Table 1.

Analysis of task inhibition: Results of the 2 × 2 ANOVAs with within-subjects variable Task Sequence (ABA, CBA) and between-subjects variable Age Group (young adults, older adults).

(A) Analysis including all participants (24 young adults, 24 older adults).
Dependent measure	Main effect Age Group			Main effect Task Sequence			Interaction Task Sequence × Age Group
	F_{(1, 46)}	p	$η_{p}^{2}$	F_{(1, 46)}	p	$η_{p}^{2}$	F_{(1, 46)}	p	$η_{p}^{2}$
MEAN PERFORMANCE
RT	56.72	<0.05	0.55	22.22	<0.05	0.33	<1.0	n.s.
Log RT	94.75	<0.05	0.67	29.21	<0.05	0.39	<1.2	n.s.
Error Rates	4.14	<0.05	0.08	8.42	<0.05	0.16	<1.0	n.s.
DIFFUSION MODEL PARAMETERS
a	7.38	<0.05	0.14	6.05	<0.05	0.12	2.42	= 0.13	0.05
ν	<1.0	n.s.		9.11	<0.05	0.17	2.68	= 0.11	0.06
t₀	116.38	<0.05	0.72	4.61	<0.05	0.09	<1.0	n.s.
s_t0	25.15	<0.05	0.35	<1.0	n.s.		<1.0	n.s.
(B) Analysis including only participants with non-outlying task inhibition effects in model parameters (22 young adults, 18 older adults).
Dependent measure	Main effect Age Group			Main effect Task Sequence			Interaction Task Sequence × Age Group
	F_{(1, 38)}	p	$η_{p}^{2}$	F_{(1, 38)}	p	$η_{p}^{2}$	F_{(1, 38)}	p	$η_{p}^{2}$
MEAN PERFORMANCE
RT	75.49	<0.05	0.67	18.10	<0.05	0.32	<1.0	n.s.
Log RT	102.33	<0.05	0.73	21.75	<0.05	0.36	<1.0	n.s.
Error Rates	4.59	<0.05	0.11	8.76	<0.05	0.19	<1.0	n.s.
DIFFUSION MODEL PARAMETERS
a	6.45	<0.05	0.15	8.87	<0.05	0.19	5.11	<0.05	0.12
ν	<1.0	n.s.		16.21	<0.05	0.30	3.78	= 0.06	0.09
t₀	92.48	<0.05	0.71	11.14	<0.05	0.23	5.93	<0.05	0.14
s_t0	23.46	<0.05	0.38	<1.0	n.s.		<1.0	n.s.