Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;8(11):757–771. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v8.i11.757

Table 1.

Studies overview

Ref. Year Country Study design Surgical technique Platform No. of pts Robot No. of pts Lap No. of pts Open
Park et al[8] 2015 South Korea Comparative Hybrid DV 133 84
Levic et al[9] 2014 Denmark Comparative NS DV 56 36
Yoo et al[10] 2014 South Korea Comparative Tot rob NS 44 26
Koh et al[11] 2014 Singapore Comparative NS NS 19 19
Melich et al[12] 2014 Canada Comparative Tot rob DV 92 106
Barnajian et al[13] 2014 United States Comparative Hybrid DV-S 20 20 20
Ielpo et al[14] 2014 Spain Comparative Tot rob NS 56 87
Tam et al[15] 2014 United States Comparative Hybrid DV 21 21
Ghezzi et al[16] 2014 Brazil Comparative Tot rob DV-S 65 109
Kuo et al[17] 2014 Taiwan Comparative Tot rob DV 36 28
Park et al[18] 2014 South Korea Comparative Hybrid DV 32 32
Saklani et al[19] 2013 South Korea Comparative NS NS 74 64
Fernandez et al[20] 2013 United States Comparative Hybrid DV-S 13 59
Erguner et al[21] 2013 Turkey Comparative Hybrid NS 27 37
D’Annibale et al[22] 2013 Italy Comparative Tot rob DV-S 50 50
Kang et al[23] 2013 South Korea Comparative Tot rob NS 165 165 165
Park et al[24] 2013 South Korea Comparative Hybrid DV 40 40
Kim et al[25] 2012 South Korea Comparative Tot rob DV 62 147
Kim et al[26] 2012 South Korea Comparative Hybrid DV 30 39
Bertani et al[27] 2011 Italy Comparative Tot rob DV 52 34
Kwak et al[28] 2011 South Korea Comparative Tot rob DV 59 59
Baek et al[29] 2011 United States Comparative NS NS 41 41
Park et al[30] 2011 South Korea Comparative Hybrid DV 52 123 88
Patriti et al[31] 2009 Italy Comparative Hybrid DV 29 37
Baik et al[32] 2008 South Korea Comparative Hybrid DV 18 18
Pigazzi et al[33] 2006 United States Comparative Hybrid DV 6 6
Parisi et al[34] 2014 Italy Case series Hybrid DV Si 40
Baek et al[35] 2014 South Korea Case series NS NS 182
Shiomi et al[36] 2014 Japan Case series Hybrid DV 113
Kim et al[37] 2014 South Korea Case series Tot rob DV-S 200
Stănciulea et al[38] 2013 Romania Case series Tot rob DV-Si 100
Zawadzki et al[39] 2013 United States Case series Hybrid DV 77
Sng et al[40] 2013 South Korea Case series Tot rob DV-S 197
Du et al[41] 2013 China Case series Tot rob DV 22
Alimoglu et al[42] 2012 Turkey Case series Tot rob DV 7
Akmal et al[43] 2012 United States Case series Hybrid DV 80
Park et al[44] 2012 United States Case series Hybrid DV-S 30
Kang et al[45] 2011 South Korea Case series Hybrid DV 389
deSouza et al[46] 2010 United States Case series Hybrid DV 44
Pigazzi et al[47] 2010 United States Case series Hybrid DV 143
Choi et al[48] 2009 South Korea Case series Tot rob DV 50
Ng et al[49] 2009 Singapore Case series Hybrid DV 8
Hellan et al[50] 2007 United States Case series Hybrid DV 39

Tot rob: Totally Robotic; DV: Da Vinci; NS: Not specified.