Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 1;25(3):171–177. doi: 10.5978/islsm.16-OR-12

Table 2: Patient characteristics, intervention and outcome according to limb treatment by endovenous laser ablation using the 980 nm and 1470 nm laser.

980nm 1470nm
Patients, No. (%) 20 (8) 220 (92)
Age, y M±SD 65 ± 10 65 ± 10
Men : female 8:12 70:150
Right : left 8:12 124:96
GSV : SSV 17:3 197:23
Diameter, mm M±SD 8.5 ± 2.2 7.3 ± 2.2
Op time, min M±SD 40 ± 11 27 ± 10
With phlebectomy 42 ± 10 34 ± 8
With no phlebectomy 31 ± 9* 22 ±7*
Length, cm M±SD 36 ± 10 33 ± 10
LEED (J/cm) M±SD 84 ± 10 77 ± 18
Time, sec M±SD 382 ± 103 250 ± 93
Complications
Pain, mild: moderate (%) 4 (20) : 2 (10) 5 (2.3) : 0
Induration along SV -** 4 (1.8)
Bruising, mild: moderate: severe(%) 1 (5) : 0 : 1 (5) 6 (2.7) : 1 (0.45) : 0
EHIT class 1:2:3 (%) 4 (20) : 1(5) : 0 52 (24) : 4 (2) : 0
Skin burn (%) 0 1 (0.45%)
Nerve injury (%) 0 2 (0.90)

EVLA, endovenous laser ablation; GSV, great saphenous vein; SSV, short saphenous vein; SV, saphenous vein; Diameter, Vein diameter; M±SD, mean ± standard; Op time, Operative time; Length, Length of treated SV; LEED, linear endovenous energy density; Time, Ablation time; EHIT, endovenous heat-induced thrombus

*:

The mean operative time in group B1 (with no phlebectomy) was 31 ± 9 minutes, while that in group B2 (with no phlebectomy) was 22 ±7 minutes, which was statistically significant (p<0.05).

**:

no data