Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 24;57(6):408–416. doi: 10.4111/icu.2016.57.6.408

Table 2. Demographic data and success rate comparisons between stenting and stentless groups for the propensity-matched cohort.

Variable Total matched cohort (n=399) Stenting group (n=57) Stentless group (n=342) p-value
Age (y) 56.22±13.86 56.86±14.10 56.11±13.84 0.708a
Sex 0.681b
 Male 265 (66.4) 36 (63.2) 229 (67.0)
 Female 134 (33.6) 21 (36.8) 113 (33.0)
MSL (mm) 10.75±4.27 12.03±6.02 10.53±3.88 0.075a
SSD (cm) 110.30±20.25 105.90±24.84 111.50±19.46 0.140a
MSD (HU) 758.14±285.11 717.86±285.06 764.94±284.92 0.250a
SHI (HU) 250.43±116.45 237.89±121.75 250.99±117.80 0.381a
Prior stone episodes 0.763b
 FSF 280 (70.2) 39 (68.4) 241 (70.5)
RSF 119 (29.8) 18 (31.6) 101 (29.5)
Stone location 0.617b
 Upper 328 (82.2) 46 (80.7) 282 (82.5)
 Middle 30 (7.5) 6 (10.5) 24 (7.0)
 Lower 41 (10.3) 5 (8.8) 36 (10.5)
Stone laterality 0.775b
 Right 196 (49.1) 29 (50.9) 167 (48.8)
 Left 203 (50.8) 28 (49.1) 175 (51.2)
One-session success 252 (63.1) 28 (49.1) 224 (78.6) 0.026b

Values are presented as mean±standard deviation or number (%).

MSL, maximal stone length; SSD, skin-to-stone distance; MSD, mean stone density; SHI, stone heterogeneity index; FSF, first-time stone formers; RSF, recurrent stone formers; HU, Hounsfield units.

a:Based on Student or Welch's two-sample t-tests. b:Based on Pearson chi-square tests with Yates' continuity correction.