Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 14;17:142. doi: 10.1186/s12863-016-0452-8

Table 3.

Comparisons of distribution frequency and representativeness among five different core collections constructed based on diverse sampling strategies

Evaluated parameter Data combination Entire germplasm collection
Gcc Ggcc Pcc G + Pcc Gg + Pcc
Number of entries (%) 7 (0.2) 53 (1.4) 76 (2.0) 76 (2.0) 240 (6.3) 3,821
Number of alleles 96 96 264 360 360 360
Continuous variables MD % 38.28 18.89 15.85 15.35 9.45 -
CR % 13.95 50.89 96.99 97.04 98.40 -
VD % 5757.70 80.02 49.37 46.55 32.46 -
VR % 52.15 112.37 126.99 125.95 115.65 -
Categorical variables I 0.88 0.91 0.94 0.97 0.95 0.85
I max 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25 1.25
J’ 0.77 0.79 0.78 0.81 0.80 0.73

Gcc: core collection constructed based on genotype with nongroup based strategy, Ggcc: core collection constructed from entries in each cluster grouped by genotype, Pcc: core collection constructed based on phenotype, G + Pcc: core collection constructed based on combination of genotype and phenotype, Gg + Pcc: core collection constructed based on genotype and phenotype combination from each cluster grouped by genotype. Distributional aspects to validate a representativeness of core collection; MD%: the mean difference percentage, CR%: the coincidence rate, VD%: the variance difference percentage, VR%: variable rate. Genetic diversity indices to validate categorical variables; I: Shannon’s information index of diversity, I max: logarithmic number of classes in entire collection, J’: genetics evenness