Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;16:145. doi: 10.1186/s12911-016-0388-y

Table 1.

Survey scales and items, their source, and internal consistencies. (For precise item wording, see Appendix B)

Scale and items Source Cronbach’s alpha
Perceived ease of use, expanded (6 items)
• Clear and understandable
• Easy to use
• Requires a lot of mental effort
• Easy to get it to do what I want
• Easy to learn
• Easy to navigate
TAM; Venkatesh & Morris [55]
+ two new items created based on usability definitions (learnability, navigability) [43]
0.873
Perceived usefulness, traditional (4 items)
• Improves job performance
• Increases productivity
• Enhances effectiveness in job
• Useful in job
TAM; Venkatesh & Morris [55] 0.929
Perceived usefulness for patient/family involvement, contextualized (4 items)
• Improves patient/family interaction
• Improves sharing information with family
• Improves communication with family
• Improves family engagement
Newly created for study, based on nursing TAM; Holden et al. [22] 0.941
Perceived usefulness for care delivery, contextualized (4 items)
• Improves patient care
• Improves information organization
• Improves access to patient information
• Improves sharing info with care team
Nursing TAM; Holden et al.,[22] and adapted to the study context 0.916
Social influence, institutional (3 items)
• Institution thinks I should use it
• Supervisors think I should use it
• Colleagues think I should use it
Modified from TAM research; Venkatesh et al.,[56] based on normative IT use research; Holden [36] 0.891
Social influence, patient/family (1 item)
• Patients/families like that I use it
Nursing TAM; Holden et al. [22] n/a
Perceived training on system (2 items)
• Received adequate training
• Training was clear
Nursing TAM; Holden et al., [22] based on Bailey & Pearson, [57] and adapted to the study context 0.908
Satisfaction with system (2 items)
• Satisfied with system
• Would recommend it to others
Nursing TAM; Holden et al.[22] 0.883
Intention to use system (2 items)
• Intend to use in next 6 months
• Want to use it
TAM; Venkatesh & Morris [55]; 2 item version based on Holden et al. [22] 0.903
Complete use of system (2 items)
• Use all available features
• Skip/ignore parts (reverse scored)
Nursing TAM; Holden et al., [22] adapted to the study context 0.615

TAM technology acceptance model; optimal Cronbach’s alpha value is > 0.70 and higher values are indicative of internal consistencies; the response scale was 0 (not at all), 1 (a little), 2 (some), 3 (a moderate amount), 4 (pretty much), 5 (quite a lot), 6 (a great deal), and don’t know [22, 25]