Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Networks. 2017 Jan;48:78–99. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.005

Table 8.

Maximum percent missing to remain under target bias of .25: topology, node removal defined by in-degree.

Network Correlation with centrality Component size Bicomponent size Distance Transitivity TauRC CONCOR
Interlock −.75 a 44 56 32 5 a
.75 14 10 14 1 3 42
Prison −.75 62 31 40 47 17 a
.75 30 16 12 35 8 60
Sorority −.75 54 34 38 57 17 a
.75 30 17 14 42 15 60
6th graders −.75 a a a a 18 a
.75 a 67 49 a 15 a
Coauthor −.75 45 34 40 a 25 a
.75 12 10 12 49 9 44
Prosper −.75 61 43 30 a 20 a
.75 42 32 16 53 12 a
Co-citation −.75 a a a a 15 a
.75 18 23 20 41 13 53
Elites −.75 69 36 59 58 21 a
.75 6 12 10 21 8 27
HS 13 −.75 a 69 45 a 20 a
.75 57 52 29 68 13 a
BioTech −.75 52 38 37 37 22 a
.75 9 14 11 12 9 32
HS 24 −.75 a 66 45 a 20 a
.75 56 49 27 65 13 a
CSprings −.75 50 31 36 a 21 a
.75 7 11 10 59 9 35
Mean (Std Dev) −.75 61.9 (9.4) 47.2 (16.5) 47.2 (13.4) 60.1 (14.1) 18.4 (5) 70(0)
.75 29.2 (22.2) 26.1 (19.5) 18.7 (11.5) 43 (22.4) 10.6 (3.5) 52.8 (16.2)
a

Cases where percent missing is above 70, our observed maximum. In these cases, 70 is used to calculate overall means. The maximum percent missing was calculated based on a quadratic fit to the data.