Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2018 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Networks. 2017 Jan;48:78–99. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2016.04.005

Table A3.

Maximum percent missing to remain under target bias of .25: Alternative measures of bicomponent size and ConCorr.

Network Correlation with centrality Bicomponent size (divided by size) Bicomponent size (divided by component size) ConCorr: depth set to 3 ConCorr: depths allowed to vary
Interlock −.75 44 60 a a
.75 10 12 42 36
Prison −.75 31 41 a a
.75 16 15 60 a
Sorority −.75 34 45 a a
.75 17 19 60 54
6th graders −.75 a a a a
.75 67 64 a a
Coauthor −.75 34 57 a a
.75 10 11 44 32
Prosper −.75 43 53 a a
.75 32 32 a a
Co-citation −.75 a a a a
.75 23 20 53 38
Elites −.75 36 53 a a
.75 12 4 27 10
HS 13 −.75 69 a a a
.75 52 50 a a
BioTech −.75 38 a a a
.75 14 10 32 22
HS 24 −.75 66 a a a
.75 49 49 a 68
CSprings −.75 31 54 a a
.75 11 8 35 30
Mean (Std Dev) −.75 47.2 (16.5) 59.4 (10.6) 70 (0) 70 (0)
.75 26.1 (19.5) 24.5 (19.7) 52.8 (16.2) 47.5 (22)
a

Cases where percent missing is above 70, our observed maximum. In these cases, 70 is used to calculate overall means. The maximum percent missing was calculated based on a quadratic fit to the data.