Table 6.
Statistical power for testing the treatment effect under the null and alternative hypotheses for erlotinib resistant and naïve patients by marker status in the BATTLE-2 adaptive randomization design using the Bayesian logistic regression. Cut-off values for posterior probability were chosen to control the type I error rates for comparing TX 2, 3, 4 to TX 1 under the null hypothesis to 10%.
| Prior | Scenario | Cut-off | TX | Margin | Naïve. Margin |
Resist. Margin |
Naïve. MK(−,−) |
Naïve. MK(+,−) |
Naïve. MK(−,+) |
Resist. MK(−,−) |
Resist. MK(+,−) |
Resist. MK(−,+) |
Overall | All TX |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NI | Null | 0.982 | 2 | 0.004 | 0.040 | 0.000 | 0.035 | 0.046 | 0.014 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.098 | 0.184 |
| 3 | 0.004 | 0.034 | 0.000 | 0.034 | 0.052 | 0.011 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.093 | ||||
| 4 | 0.004 | 0.018 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.010 | 0.002 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.044 | ||||
| Alt. | 2 | 0.302 | 0.463 | 0.003 | 0.348 | 0.293 | 0.083 | 0.004 | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.632 | 0.865 | ||
| 3 | 0.316 | 0.442 | 0.001 | 0.358 | 0.263 | 0.098 | 0.003 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.592 | ||||
| 4 | 0.375 | 0.440 | 0.002 | 0.348 | 0.102 | 0.244 | 0.003 | 0.004 | 0.011 | 0.622 | ||||
| Beta5 | Null | 0.984 | 2 | 0.003 | 0.038 | 0.000 | 0.033 | 0.041 | 0.013 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.091 | 0.174 |
| 3 | 0.003 | 0.033 | 0.010 | 0.030 | 0.049 | 0.009 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.095 | ||||
| 4 | 0.004 | 0.016 | 0.000 | 0.030 | 0.009 | 0.001 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.001 | 0.039 | ||||
| Alt. | 2 | 0.291 | 0.447 | 0.277 | 0.336 | 0.277 | 0.071 | 0.271 | 0.211 | 0.039 | 0.787 | 0.987 | ||
| 3 | 0.299 | 0.432 | 0.579 | 0.338 | 0.243 | 0.087 | 0.299 | 0.230 | 0.050 | 0.861 | ||||
| 4 | 0.357 | 0.423 | 0.040 | 0.337 | 0.096 | 0.225 | 0.311 | 0.208 | 0.207 | 0.801 |