Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 15.
Published in final edited form as: Clin Trials. 2010 Jun 22;7(5):584–596. doi: 10.1177/1740774510373120

Table 7.

Statistical power for testing the treatment effect under the null and alternative hypotheses for all patients and for erlotinib naïve patients by marker status in the frequentist’s equal randomization design. A p-value cut-off of 0.108 for the Fisher’s exact test was chosen to control the type I error rates for comparing TX 2, 3, 4 to TX 1 under the null hypothesis to 10%.

Scenario TX Margin Naïve
Margin
Naïve
MK(−,−)
Naïve
MK(+,−)
Naïve
MK(−,+)
Overall All TX
Null 2 0.007 0.054 0.044 0.018 0.003 0.097 0.200
3 0.006 0.058 0.053 0.018 0.001 0.099
4 0.004 0.036 0.050 0.004 0.001 0.071
Alt. 2 0.579 0.644 0.487 0.076 0.031 0.741 0.923
3 0.593 0.651 0.495 0.081 0.035 0.756
4 0.639 0.650 0.495 0.021 0.135 0.758