Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Sep 1.
Published in final edited form as: Psychol Bull. 2016 Jul 14;142(9):991–1015. doi: 10.1037/bul0000059

Table 4.

Effect Sizes for the Relation Between Positive Emotionality (PE) and Anxiety (A)

Variable k N Effect size 95% CI τ2 I2
Cross-sectionala 25c 9,800 −.24 [−.31, −.17] 0.03 90.77
Prospective, PE ➔ Aa 26 11,494 −.19 [−.23, −.14] 0.01 83.01
Prospective, controlled PE ➔ Ab 26 11,494 −.06 [−.09, −.04] 0.00 30.18
Prospective, A ➔ PEa 16 7,718 −.23 [−.29, −.17] 0.01 81.22
Prospective, controlled A ➔ PEb 15d 5,366 −.09 [−.11, −.06] 0.00 5.97

Note. Computations utilized a random effects model. k = number of studies; N = total number of participants in the k samples; CI = confidence interval; τ2 = tau-squared estimate of between-study variance; I2 = degree of heterogeneity. All effect sizes are significant at p < .05.

a

Correlation coefficient.

b

Standardized regression coefficient.

c

1 outlier (de Beurs et al., 2005).