Table 5.
Extended multiple regression analysis: prediction of future falls, n = 135
Predictorsa | Wald | P value | OR (95 % CI) |
---|---|---|---|
History of near fallsb | 6.33 | 0.012 | 3.03 (1.28–7.17) |
Retropulsion (NRT)c | 7.43 | 0.006 | 3.53 (1.43–8.72) |
Comfortable gait speed <1.1 m/s (10MWT) | 4.64 | 0.031 | 2.55 (1.09–5.98) |
Multiple logistic regression analysis backward method (Wald); Nagelkerke pseudo R square: 0.299; Hosmer and Lemeshow test: P = 0.903; tolerance: ≥0.85
Sensitivity/specificity, 0.58/0.87
CI, confidence interval; FOGQsa, Freezing of Gait Questionnaire, self-administered version; NRT, Nutt Retropulsion test; OR, odds ratio; 10MWT, 10-Meter Walk test; m/s, meter per second
aIndependent variables in the analysis were: history of falls past 12 months, history of near falls, history of FOG (FOGQsa item 3), comfortable gait speed <1.1 m/s (10MWT), retropulsion (NRT), retropulsion (UPDRS item 30), abnormal tandem gait (TG)
bDichotomous question (Yes/No): Are you ever close to falling, but you manage to grab on to something/someone at the last minute so that your body does not hit the ground?
cScores ≥1 on the NRT (unexpected shoulder pull) were categorized as having retropulsion