Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Oct 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2016 Jul 29;91:141–162. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.07.037

Table 2.

Multiple Regression Analyses for ΔReward (Reward-Trial minus No-Reward-Trial) EEG indices predicting ln(k)

B SE B β P Tolerance VIF
Constant −3.87 .32 <.001
ΔReward pre-feedback alpha .30 .25 .21 .23 .71 1.41
ΔReward feedback-locked theta following Good-Performance feedback −.37 .18 −.36 .04 .71 1.42
ΔReward feedback-locked beta (collapsing across Bad- and Good-Performance feedback) −.75 .39 −.28 .06a .99 1.01

Note. R2 = .31 (p = .006); Collinearity statistics (Tolerance and VIF) indicate that multicollinearity between the predictors was not a concern.

a

became significant (p = .03) after a bivariate outlier was removed (see Figure 12).