Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 16;6:37208. doi: 10.1038/srep37208

Table 4. Statistical Reporting in Bayesian analysis [n/N(%)].

Items All studies (n = 61) Journal impact factor* Year of publication
Low (<5.00)(n = 26) High (≥5.00)(n = 26) P-value Older studies(~2013) (n = 29) Recent studies(2014~2015) (n = 32) P-value
Was traditional meta-analysis conducted? (Yes) 42/61(68.85) 15/26(57.69) 20/26(76.92) 0.143 18/29(62.07) 24/32(93.10) 0.280
Were summary measures reported? (Yes) 57/61(93.44) 24/26(92.31) 25/26(96.15) 0.556 27/29(93.10) 30/32(93.75) 0.920
Planned methods of analysis:
 What was the model used?
  Fixed-effect 7/46(15.22) 4/20(20.00) 2/24(8.33) 0.267 6/26(23.08) 1/20(5.00) 0.094
  Random-effects 11/46(23.91) 4/20(20.00) 6/24(25.00) 0.697 6/26(23.08) 5/20(25.00) 0.881
  Fixed- and random-effects 18/46(39.13) 12/20(60.00) 6/24(25.00) 0.020 7/26(26.92) 11/20(55.00) 0.056
  Other models 10/46(21.74) 0/20(0.00) 10/24(41.67) 0.001 7/26(26.92) 3/20(15.00) 0.336
  Nor reported 15/61(24.59) 6/26(23.08) 2/26(7.69) 0.128 3/29(10.34) 12/32(37.50) 0.015
 How to present the model code?
  Supplement 5/21(23.81) 2/6(33.33) 3/15(20.00) 0.527 2/14(14.29) 3/7(42.86) 0.157
  Reference 16/21(76.19) 4/6(66.67) 12/15(80.00) 0.527 12/14(85.71) 4/7(57.14) 0.157
  Not provided 40/61(65.57) 20/26(76.92) 11/26(42.31) 0.012 15/29(51.72) 25/32(78.13) 0.032
 How to assess the model fit?
  Residual deviance 2/24(8.33) 1/14(7.14) 1/10(10.00) 0.807 1/9(11.11) 1/15(6.67) 0.709
  Deviance information criterion 15/24(62.50) 8/14(57.14) 7/10(70.00) 0.530 6/9(66.67) 9/15(60.00) 0.749
  Residual deviance+Deviance information criterion 7/24(29.17) 5/14(35.71) 2/10(20.00) 0.414 2/9(22.22) 5/15(33.33) 0.570
  Not reported 37/61(60.66) 12/26(46.15) 16/26(61.54) 0.270 20/29(68.97) 17/32(53.13) 0.210
  Was handling of multigroup trials reported? (Yes) 5/61(8.20) 1/26(3.85) 3/26(11.54) 0.303 3/29(10.34) 2/32(6.25) 0.564
 Were the prior distributions reported?
  Noninformative prior 18/31(58.06) 9/13(69.23) 10/17(58.82) 0.564 8/16(50.00) 10/15(66.67) 0.355
  Informative prior 3/31(9.68) 1/13(7.69) 2/17(11.76) 0.717 1/16(6.25) 2/15(13.33) 0.512
  Vague prior 10/31(32.26) 4/13(30.77) 6/17(35.29) 0.798 7/16(43.75) 3/15(20.00) 0.164
  Not specified 30/61(49.18) 13/26(50.00) 9/26(34.62) 0.266 13/29(44.83) 17/32(53.13) 0.521
  Sensitivity analysis based on priors 4/61(6.56) 2/26(7.69) 2/26(7.69) 1.000 2/29(6.90) 2/32(6.25) 0.920
 Was the convergence assessed?
  Not reported 37/61(60.66) 15/26(57.69) 14/26(53.85) 0.782 17/29(58.62) 20/32(62.50) 0.759
  Gelman Rubin statistic 21/24(87.50) 11/11(100.00) 10/12(83.33) 0.166 9/12(75.00) 12/12(100.00) 0.070
  Visual plot inspection 13/24(54.17) 5/11(45.45) 7/12(58.33) 0.546 7/12(58.33) 6/12(50.00) 0.688
  Observation of chain mix 2/24(8.33) 2/11(18.18) 0/12(0.00) 0.131 1/12(8.33) 1/12(8.33) 1.000
 Was the heterogeneity in NMA assessed?
  Precision (Tau2) 4/61(6.56) 0/26(0.00) 4/26(15.38) 0.039 4/29(13.79) 0/32(0.00) 0.031
  Not reported 57/61(93.44) 26/26(100.00) 22/26(84.62) 0.039 25/29(86.21) 32/32(100.00) 0.031
 Was the similarity in NMA assessed?
  Not reported 53/61(86.89) 22/26(84.62) 22/26(84.62) 1.000 23/29(79.31) 30/32(93.75) 0.098
  Comparing patients’ or trials’ characteristics 5/8(62.50) 2/4(50.00) 3/4(75.00) 0.495 4/6(66.67) 1/2(50.00) 0.693
  Investigating potential effect modifying covariates 3/8(37.50) 2/4(50.00) 1/4(25.00) 0.495 2/6(33.33) 1/2(50.00) 0.693
Were the inconsistency assessed?
 Not reported 44/61(72.13) 20/26(76.92) 16/26(61.54) 0.234 20/29(68.97) 24/32(75.00) 0.603
 Inconsistency/incoherence factors 4/17(23.53) 1/6(16.67) 2/10(20.00) 0.873 3/9(33.33) 1/8(12.50) 0.327
 Hypothesis test 8/17(47.06) 2/6(33.33) 6/10(60.00) 0.317 4/9(44.44) 4/8(50.00) 0.824
 Node-splitting analysis 5/17(29.41) 3/6(50.00) 2/10(20.00) 0.225 2/9(22.22) 3/8(37.50) 0.503
Was the publication or reporting bias assessed?
 Comparison-adjusted funnel plot 1/61(1.64) 0/26(0.00) 1/26(3.85) 0.317 0/29(0.00) 1/32(3.13) 0.341
 Not reported 60/61(98.36) 26/26(100.00) 25/26(96.15) 0.317 29/29(100.00) 31/32(96.87) 0.341
Additional analyses:
 Was a sensitivity analysis performed? (Yes) 24/61(39.34) 10/26(38.46) 12/26(46.15) 0.578 12/29(41.38) 12/32(37.50) 0.759
 Was subgroup analysis or meta-regression performed? (Yes) 12/61(19.67) 3/26(11.54) 7/26(26.92) 0.163 7/29(24.14) 5/32(15.63) 0.407
 Was the GRADE used? (Yes) 3/61(4.92) 1/26(3.85) 2/26(7.69) 0.556 2/29(6.90) 1/32(3.13) 0.500

*9 studies published in journals with no associated impact factor.