Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 21;113(45):E7126–E7135. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1614788113

Table S1.

Comparison of footprint preparation in Arabidopsis ribosome profiling

Experimental procedure Liu et al., 2013 (25) Juntawong et al., 2014 (26) Merchante et al., 2015 (27) Hsu et al., 2016 (current study)
Polysome extraction buffer pH 8, medium ionic strength/buffering capacity pH 9, high ionic strength/buffering capacity ∼pH 9, medium ionic strength/buffering capacity pH 8, low ionic strength/buffering capacity
Amount of starting materials Not specified 15-mL pulverized tissues 1.5 g 0.1 g
Pellet polysomes Not required Sucrose cushion (ultracentrifugation for 18 h) Sucrose cushion (ultracentrifugation for 3.5 h) Not required
RNase digestion condition Directly digest with the polysome extracts in a large volume for 1 h Pellet polysomes, resuspend in medium ionic strength/buffering capacity buffer, digest for 2 h Pellet polysomes, resuspend in a large volume of medium ionic strength/buffering capacity buffer, digest for 2 h Directly digest with the polysome extracts for 1 h
Monosome isolation Sucrose cushion (ultracentrifugation, time not specified) Sucrose gradient (ultracentrifugation for 1.5 h) and fractionation Sucrose cushion (ultracentrifugation for 3.5 h), then sucrose gradient (ultracentrifugation 2.5 h) and fractionation Size exclusion columns (benchtop centrifuge, 2 min)
Size of footprints isolated Not specified 25–35 nt 28–32 nt 28–30 nt
Resulting % reads in the max reading frame for 28-nt footprints ∼58 ∼37 ∼62 92–96