Table 3.
Top predicted destabilizing mutants based on the E2 core structure
| Mutant | Score* | Average A-D† |
| Y611A | 6.4 | 0.8 |
| W616A | 4.8 | 84.2 |
| R614A | 4.7 | 0.9 |
| F550A | 4.6 | 25.8 |
| F509A | 4.3 | 0.7 |
| Y507A | 3.8 | 14.1 |
| W554A | 3.8 | 0.4 |
| W549A | 3.8 | 37.8 |
| W437A | 3.8 | 73.0 |
| F537A | 3.5 | 5.2 |
Mutants in bold denote measured destabilizing mutants based on reactivity to conformation-dependent antibodies for antigenic domains A-D. Mutants in italics exhibit major disparity between antibody-inferred E2 stability and impact on stability predicted from the E2 core structure (18).
Rosetta score (35) for predicted energetic impact of mutant on E2.
Average percent binding versus wild-type E2 for conformation-dependent E2 antibodies.