Table 2.
Correlations between emotion regulation outcomes and key study variables
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Emotion Regulation Outcomes | |||||||
| 1) Attention–Negative Facilitation | 1.00 | ||||||
| 2) Attention–Negative Disengagement | .44** | 1.00 | |||||
| 3) Appraisal–Frightened | −.11** | −.08 | 1.00 | ||||
| 4) Appraisal–Angry | −.09+ | −.05 | .15** | 1.00 | |||
| 5) Appraisal–Sad | −.03 | −.08 | .10+ | .24** | 1.00 | ||
| 6) Response–Internalizing | .08 | .02 | .03 | −.00 | .05 | 1.00 | |
| 7) Response–Externalizing | .11+ | .00 | .09+ | .01 | .14* | .38** | 1.00 |
| Child and Family Characteristics | |||||||
| 2004 Cohort | −.06 | −.04 | −.01 | −.02 | −.11* | −.11* | −.11+ |
| Child Gender – Boy | .03 | .01 | .00 | −.12* | −.04 | −.04 | .25** |
| Child Age | −.04 | .05 | −.13* | −.08 | −.16** | −.09 | −.09 |
| Child Race – Black | .02 | .07 | .03 | .03 | .18** | .04 | .23** |
| Child Race – Hispanic | .00 | −.03 | −.03 | −.02 | −.16** | −.02 | −.22** |
| Maternal Educ <HS | −.04 | .04 | .03 | .07 | −.03 | .01 | −.01 |
| Inc-to-Needs Ratio | −.09 | −.01 | −.10+ | −.16** | −.14** | −.07 | −.16** |
| Mother Unemployed | .01 | −.12* | .06 | .06 | .15** | .06 | .06 |
| Mother Married | −.08 | .04 | .05 | −.05 | −.04 | −.05 | −.13* |
| Number of Times Moved (past year) | .08 | −.03 | .07 | −.01 | .15** | .05 | .05 |
| Child Interpersonal Violence Exposure | .04 | .00 | .10+ | .02 | .09+ | .18** | .21** |
| Neighborhood Characteristics | |||||||
| # Crimes | .08 | .08 | −.04 | .02 | .13* | −.08 | .03 |
| Race – % Black | .03 | .05 | .03 | .01 | .18** | .06 | .18** |
| Race – % Hispanic | .02 | −.03 | −.00 | .02 | −.16** | −.05 | −.18** |
| % Single Mother | −.03 | .05 | −.01 | .07 | .19** | .05 | .11* |
| % <HS Education | −.02 | −.01 | .02 | .07 | −.07 | −.07 | .13* |
| % Unemployed | −.04 | .02 | .07 | .06 | .14** | .07 | −.02 |
| % Poverty | −.04 | .03 | .02 | .06 | .16** | .04 | .08 |
Note
**
p < .01
*
p < .05
+
p < .10.