Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Aug 7.
Published in final edited form as: Phys Med Biol. 2016 Jul 6;61(15):5486–5507. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/61/15/5486

Figure 14.

Figure 14

PWIP across the 7mm inclusion in Phantom 4. Panel A: Although the PWIP (blue) correctly identified the location, contrast and size of the smallest inclusion, the error bars in this case are much wider due to one of the 4 inversions producing a much higher compliance estimate than expected. Compliance is overrestimated by 30–80% compared to static testing. See the caption of figure 8 for an explanation of panels B–D.