Table 5.
Follow-up | No (%) of patients | Raw risk difference* (95% CI) | Adjusted risk difference* (95% CI)† | P value‡ | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Physiotherapy | Usual care | ||||
Non-sports injury | |||||
Baseline | 0/143 (0) | 0/145 (0) | — | — | — |
1 month | 13/135 (10) | 18/137 (13) | −4% (−11% to 4%) | −2% (−9% to 4%) | 0.32 |
3 months | 56/131 (43) | 48/124 (39) | 4% (−8% to 16%) | 3% (−8% to 14%) | 0.66 |
6 months | 63/117 (54) | 70/112 (63) | −9% (−21% to 4%) | −9% (−21% to 3%) | 0.13 |
Sports injury | |||||
Baseline | 0/110 (0) | 0/105 (0) | — | — | — |
1 month | 13/104 (13) | 16/102 (16) | −3% (−13% to 6%) | −0% (−8% to 7%) | 0.61 |
3 months | 42/98 (43) | 31/90 (34) | 8% (−5% to 22%) | 9% (−3% to 22%) | 0.22 |
6 months | 55/91 (60) | 50/83 (60) | 0% (−14% to 15%) | 0% (−14% to 14%) | 0.93 |
Grade 1 | |||||
Baseline | 0/69 (0) | 0/80 (0) | — | — | — |
1 month | 10/66 (15) | 15/75 (20) | −5% (−17% to 8%) | 2% (−13% to 16%) | 0.37 |
3 months | 38/67 (57) | 35/68 (51) | 5% (−12% to 22%) | 4% (−12% to 21%) | 0.60 |
6 months | 43/60 (72) | 46/64 (72) | −0% (−16% to 16%) | −2% (−18% to 13%) | 0.89 |
Grade 2 | |||||
Baseline | 0/184 (0) | 0/170 (0) | — | — | — |
1 month | 16/173 (9) | 19/164 (12) | −2% (−9% to 4%) | −2% (−7% to 3%) | 0.42 |
3 months | 60/162 (37) | 44/146 (30) | 7% (−4% to 17%) | 6% (−3% to 16%) | 0.26 |
6 months | 75/148 (51) | 74/131 (56) | −6% (−18% to 6%) | −6% (−18% to 5%) | 0.26 |
*Positive risk difference favours physiotherapy arm.
†Adjusted risk difference uses generalised linear model with binomial outcome and identity link to control for quarter of FAOS at baseline.
‡P value based on Mantel-Haenszel test, stratified by quarter of FAOS at baseline.
§P value for subgroup by treatment interaction 0.77 at 1 month, 0.50 at 3 months, and 0.27 at 6 months.
¶P value for subgroup by treatment interaction 0.97 at 1 month, 0.85 at 3 months, and 0.59 at 6 months.