Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 3;2016:7684915. doi: 10.1155/2016/7684915

Table 4.

MiRC for GbC: intraoperative and postoperative outcomes and pathologic findings.

Author, year of publication Mean blood loss, mL (range) Mean operation duration, min (range) Morbidity Mortality Mean LOS, days (range) Mean f-up duration, months DFS at last f-up, rate Recurrence location T0-T1a/T1b/T2/T3 Mean number of resected nodes, (range) NX/N0/N+
Cho et al., 2008 [16] Minor 102
(89–146)
0 0 5
(4–7)
15 100% 1/0/2/0 4
(4-5)
0/3/0
de Aretxabala et al., 2010 [17] NS NS 0 0 3
NS
22 80% Peritoneum (case 1) 3/13/5/2$ 6
(3–12)
8/14/1$
Gumbs and Hoffman, 2010§ [18] 117
(50–200)
227
(120–360)
0 0 4
(3–5)
NS NS NS 0/1/0/0 3
(1–6)
0/1/0
Gumbs and Hoffman, 2010§ [19] 137
(50–300)
204
(95–360)
0 0 4
(3-4)
NS NS NS 0/0/0/1 3
(1–6)
0/0/1
Belli et al., 2011 [25] 85 162 0 0 5 33 100% No NA NA NA
Shen et al., 2012£ [20] 210
(50–400)
200
(120–360)
0 0 7 11 80% NS 0/0/2/3 9
(3–11)
0/2/3
Gumbs et al., 2013# [21] 160
(0–400)
220
(120–480)
0& 0 4
(2–8)
23 87% Hep pedicle (case 1)
Liver (case 2)
0/8/4/3 4
(1–11)
0/12/3
Machado et al., 2015 [15] 240 300 0 0 4 12 100% 0/1/0/0 9 0/1/0
Yoon et al., 2015 [22] 100
(10–1500)
205
(90–360)
6/32 0 4
(2–13)
60 95% Liver (case 1)
Lung (case 2)
Liver + lung (case 3)
Colon (case 4)
0/7/25/0 7
(1–15)
0/27/5
Shirobe and Maruyama, 2015 [23] 92
(10–643)
196
(150–490)
1/11 0 6
(4–19)
84 82% Hep pedicle + pleural (case 1)
Hep pedicle (case 2)
0/3/8/0 13
(9–18)
0/11/0
Agarwal et al., 2015 [26] 200
(100–850)
270
(180–340)
3/24 0 5
(3–16)
18 96% Hep pedicle (case 1) 4/1/11/8 10
(4–31)
0/19/5
Itano et al., 2015% [27] 152
(±90)
368
(±73)
1/16 0 9
(±1.6)
37 100% 1/2/13/0 13
(±3.1)
0/16/0
Palanisamy et al., 2016% [24] 196
(±73)
212
(±26)
4/14 0 5
(±0.9)
51 75% NS 0/0/11/1 8
(4–14)
0/9/3

MiRC: minimally invasive radical cholecystectomy, GbC: gallbladder cancer, f-up: follow-up, DFS: disease-free survival, NS: not specified, and LOS: length of hospital stay.

§Pathologic findings available for only one patient.

#Multicenter retrospective study.

$Data regarding 23 patients affected by GbC initially included in the study (including 5 patients who underwent only laparoscopic exploration, without attempt for MiRC).

& The absence of postoperative bile leak, abdominal collection, and need for reoperation.

Blood loss, operation duration, LOS, and resected nodes # are expressed in median (range).

%Blood loss, operation duration, LOS, and resected nodes # are expressed in mean (±standard deviation). Only 12 patients affected by GbC were included in pathological and survival analysis.