Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 17;6:37332. doi: 10.1038/srep37332

Table 4. Comparison of Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer thickness between LHON patients and the control group.

  Acute LHON patients Carrier LHON patients Control group Acute LHON patients vs Control group Carrier LHON patients vs Control group Acute LHON patients vs Carrier LHON patients
RNFL Average thickness (μm) 121.7 ± 33.1 109.7 ± 10.1 99.9 ± 6.6 p = 0.002** p = 0.038* p = 0.001**
RNFL T thickness (μm) 64.7 ± 19.3 83.4 ± 15.3 67.38 ± 10.6 p = 1.0 p < 0.0001** p = 0.001**
RNFL S thickness (μm) 169.9 ± 33.4 131.5 ± 14.6 129.3 ± 16.1 p < 0.0001** p = 1.0 p < 0.0001**
RNFL N thickness (μm) 95.2 ± 13.5 82.7 ± 20.1 79.0 ± 16.6 p = 0.061 p = 1.0 p = 0.190
RNFL I thickness (μm) 158.1 ± 16.4 144.1 ± 20.5 123.7 ± 10.6 p < 0.0001** p < 0.0001** p = 0.018*

LHON: Leber Hereditary Optic Neuropathy; RNFL: Retinal Nerve Fiber Layer; SF: sub-foveal; T: temporal quadrant; S: superior quadrant; N: nasal quadrant; I: inferior quadrant.

Data are showed as mean ± SD. Values were compared between each LHON group and healthy subjects, by means of one-way analysis of covariance (ANCOVA), followed by Bonferroni post hoc test. Gender was used as covariate in the analysis.

*<0.05, **<0.01.