Table 9. Gene duplication analysis of novel WRKY TFs identified during this study.
Figure 1 | Genes | Z-score | Percentage of confidence Level |
---|---|---|---|
A | GrWRKY12 | 8.12 | 100 |
B | AcWRKY1 | 6.7 | 100 |
C | LuWRKY3-5 | 4.42 | 100 |
D | BrWRKY36-2 | 8.22 | 100 |
E | FvWRKY59 | 20.58 | 100 |
F | PhWRKY59 | 19.82 | 100 |
G | BrWRKY58-1 | 25.80 | 100 |
H | AtWRKY19 | 25.98 | 100 |
I | OsWRKY57 | 8.43 | 100 |
J | FvWRKY52 | 15.34 | 100 |
K | FvWRKY70-7 | 18.80 | 100 |
L | FvWRKY16 | 6.67 | 100 |
M | SbWRKY59 | 1.78 | 92.5 |
N | AlWRKY16 | 12.53 | 100 |
O | PvWRKY94-1 | 1.11 | 73.2 |
P | SiWRKY59-2 | 1.11 | 73.4 |
The result showed that SbWRKY29, PvWRKY94-1 and SiWRKY59-2 are non duplicated WRKY TFs. A z-score value above four is considered duplicated, whereas a value below four was considered nonduplicated. The duplication analysis was performed as described in Pinda (pipeline for intraspecies duplication analysis)81.