Table 2.

Prediction of daily dog walking intention-behavior profiles using multi-process action control variables and dog size

	Intention-Behavior Profiles			Correlation with Discriminant Function	Univariate Follow-Up F2,218	Post Hocs
	Non-intenders (n = 59)	Unsuccessful Intenders (n = 75)	Successful Intenders (n = 91)
Dog Breed Size	2.05 (0.87)	1.89 (0.86)	2.34 (0.77)	.28	6.33*	NI,UI < SI
Outcome Expectations (Human)	3.98 (0.77)	3.92 (0.83)	4.28 (0.78)	.14	NA	NA
Outcome Expectation (Canine)	4.60 (0.52)	4.65 (0.47)	4.81 (0.40)	.07	NA	NA
Affective Judgements	4.10 (0.82)	4.35 (0.59)	4.69 (0.41)	.33	18.43*	NI < UI < SI
Perceived Capability	4.48 (0.98)	4.73 (0.52)	4.76 (0.61)	-.03	NA	NA
Perceived Opportunity	4.27 (0.84)	4.54 (0.61)	4.62 (0.67)	.03	NA	NA
Behavioral Regulation	2.73 (0.93)	3.04 (0.93)	3.42 (0.92)	.33	10.27*	NI < UI < SI
Automaticity	3.00 (1.02)	3.63 (1.09)	3.96 (0.98)	.38	15.65*	NI < UI < SI
Identity	3.33 (1.01)	3.49 (0.85)	4.07 (0.63)	.22	17.53*	NI,UI < SI

Note: * = p < 0.01. NI = non-intenders, UI = unsuccessful intenders, SI = successful intenders. NA = not applicable. Post hoc tests interpreted as p < 0.05 and d > 0.30 based on the recommended minimum effect size for social science data (Ferguson [43]; Cohen [44])