Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0166460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166460

Table 1. Scoring results for the analysed targets/interfaces.

Target.Interface # models NL %NL H M A I R CONSRANK Clust-CONSRANK
S25 S30 C40 C50 C60 C80 MC200 MC/5 MC/10
T29 2083 144 6.9 2 72 70 1629 310 10/9* 2/2* 2/2* 4/3* 4/2* 4/2* 3/2* 2/1* 2/1* 2/1*
T30 1343 2 0.15 0 0 2 1104 237 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0*
T32 599 15 2.5 0 3 12 557 27 0/0* 0/0* 2/0* 0/0* 0/0* 1/0* 1/0* 2/0* 2/0* 1/0
T35 499 2 0.40 0 0 2 465 32 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0*
T37 1500 78 5.2 8 35 35 1060 362 9/9* 0/0* 0/0* 3/2* 1/1* 0/0* 0/0* 1/1* 1/1* 2/1*
T39 1400 4 0.29 0 3 1 1257 139 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 1/1*
T40.CA 2180 354 16 90 141 123 1531 295 10/10* 2/2* 1/1* 5/4* 6/4* 7/5* 6/4* 1/1* 4/4* 2/2*
T40.CB 2180 134 6.2 86 22 26 1751 295 0/0* 1/1* 1/1* 2/2* 1/1* 1/1* 1/1* 1/1* 1/1* 1/1*
T41 1200 299 25 2 99 198 730 171 10/5* 1/0* 1/0* 3/1* 5/2* 5/2* 4/2* 4/1* 5/2* 3/1*
T46 1699 24 1.4 0 0 24 1297 378 0/0* 0/0* 1/0* 0/0* 0/0* 1/0* 0/0* 1/0* 0/0* 0/0*
T47 1051 600 57 278 301 21 388 63 10/10* 1/1* 1/1* 8/8* 6/6* 4/4* 1/1* 6/6* 8/8* 2/2*
T50 1451 124 8.6 0 35 89 1141 184 0/0* 2/0* 2/1* 0/0* 1/0* 1/1* 2/0* 3/1* 2/0* 2/2*
T53 1400 101 7.2 0 9 92 1090 209 3/0* 1/0* 1/0* 0/0* 1/0* 2/0* 1/0* 1/0* 1/0* 1/0*
T54 1400 19 1.4 0 1 18 1195 185 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 1/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 1/0* 0/0* 1/0*
T72.1 914 6 0.66 0 0 6 659 249 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0*
T79.1 999 20 2.0 0 7 13 701 278 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0*
T79.2 999 63 6.3 0 7 56 658 278 0/0* 2/0* 2/0* 3/0* 3/0* 1/0* 2/0* 2/0* 2/0* 1/0*
T79.3 999 2 0.20 0 0 2 719 278 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0*
T86.1 1010 30 3.0 0 5 25 942 38 0/0* 1/0* 1/0* 1/0* 1/0* 1/0* 0/0* 0/0* 0/0* 1/0*
T86.2 1010 25 2.5 0 8 17 947 38 0/0* 1/0* 1/0* 2/1* 1/0* 2/1* 1/0* 1/0* 1/0* 1/0*

Columns 1–9: features of analysed targets: H, M, A, I and R indicate the high, medium-quality, acceptable, incorrect and removed models. NL stays for native-like, that is the sum of H, M and A models. Columns 10–19: results of the scoring with original CONSRANK scoring algorithm and with different combined Consrank-clustering approaches. In each column the total number of NL/H+M* models per target/interface is reported. “S” stays for Single, “C” for Complete, with numbers indicating the corresponding thresholds used in the clustering; MC200, MC/5 and MC/10” indicate results of a clustering approach with a maximum number of clusters fixed to 200 and to 1/5 and 1/10 of the total number of models per target, respectively (see Methods) Positive results are highlighted in cyan.