Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 15;11(11):e0166282. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166282

Table 3. Canonical pathways predicted to be significantly altered in both cohorts in B vs. A group samples.

The first three data columns refer to our cohort, and the last three to the Jorissen cohort.

Ingenuity Canonical Pathways log(p-value) Down Up log(p-value) (Jorissen) Down (Jorissen) Up (Jorissen)
Role of BRCA1 in DNA Damage Response 10.6 0/60 (0%) 46/60 (77%) 1.85 12/61 (20%) 17/61 (28%)
Protein Ubiquitination Pathway 9.27 20/249 (8%) 126/249 (51%) 6.54 21/251 (8%) 101/251 (40%)
Cell Cycle: G2/M DNA Damage Checkpoint Regulation 8.48 1/48 (2%) 32/48 (67%) 1.79 7/49 (14%) 17/49 (35%)
Hereditary Breast Cancer Signaling 7.29 7/111 (6%) 61/111 (55%) 1.68 16/112 (14%) 32/112 (29%)
Cell Cycle: G1/S Checkpoint Regulation 4.86 7/63 (11%) 32/63 (51%) 1.38 12/63 (19%) 16/63 (25%)
Regulation of eIF4 and p70S6K Signaling 4.54 10/141 (7%) 72/141 (51%) 1.42 13/140 (9%) 44/140 (31%)
Cyclins and Cell Cycle Regulation 4.46 10/77 (13%) 36/77 (47%) 1.31 11/77 (14%) 22/77 (29%)
DNA damage-induced 14-3-3“€ Signaling 3.47 3/19 (16%) 11/19 (58%) 1.63 2/19 (11%) 9/19 (47%)
Gluconeogenesis I 2.83 2/24 (8%) 12/24 (50%) 1.33 2/23 (9%) 10/23 (43%)
mTOR Signaling 2.19 16/178 (9%) 73/178 (41%) 1.42 21/181 (12%) 51/181 (28%)
Polyamine Regulation in Colon Cancer 2.12 1/22 (5%) 12/22 (55%) 1.68 0/21 (0%) 12/21 (57%)
dTMP De Novo Biosynthesis 1.86 0/5 (0%) 4/5 (80%) 1.35 0/5 (0%) 4/5 (80%)
Androgen Signaling 1.44 11/109 (10%) 42/109 (39%) 1.84 13/110 (12%) 35/110 (32%)
Calcium Transport I 1.37 3/9 (33%) 2/9 (22%) 1.38 2/9 (22%) 4/9 (44%)
Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress Pathway 1.34 0/21 (0%) 12/21 (57%) 1.68 2/21 (10%) 10/21 (48%)