Table 1.
Lesion type | NPC component associated with lesion | Cell cycle phase of association | Mediators (NPC interaction dependent on) | Function of relocalization | Reference |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Persistent DSB (HO | Nup84 (ChIP) | G1/S/G2 | Slx5/8 | Increase survival | Nagai et al. (2008); |
break, no donor for | Nup133 (ChIP) | Mec1/Tel1 | Promote gene conversion | Kalocsay, Hiller and | |
repair) | Nic96 (ChIP) | Swr1 | Promote ectopic BIR | Jentsch (2009); Oza | |
Nup49 (Imaginga, b) | Mms21 | Promote MMEJ | et al. (2009); Horigome | ||
Siz2 | Suppress GCRs | et al. (2014, 2016) | |||
Smc5/6e | |||||
Subtelomeric DSB | Nup84 (ChIP) | N/D | Kinesin14 (Cik1, Kar3) | Increase survival | Therizols et al. (2006); |
Cohibin (Lrs4, Csm1) | Promote end joiningf | Chung et al. (2015) | |||
Swr1e | Promote Rad52-dependent BIR | ||||
Eroded telomere | Nup49 (ChIP, | Senescing | Slx5/8 | Relocalize to pores from NE | Khadaroo et al. (2009); |
(Imaginga) | cells | Siz1/Siz2 | Promote Rad52-dependent | Churikov et al. (2016) | |
Rad9/Rad24e | type II recombination | ||||
Collapsed fork | Nup49 (Imaginga, b) | S | - | Increase survival | Nagai et al. (2008) |
by HU + MMSc | Promote fork restart | ||||
Collapsed fork at | Nup49 (Imagingb) | S | Nup84 | Reduce repeat breakage and | Su et al. (2015) |
CAG repeatsd | Nup84 (ChIP) | Slx5/8 | instability | ||
Suppress Rad52-dependent HR |
Colocalization of fluorescently tagged pore protein with the lesion in either wild-type or nup133ΔN mutant cells (which clusters NPCs to one side of the nucleus; Doye, Wepf and Hurt 1994).
Preferential localization of the lesion at the periphery of the nucleus (zone 1) by zoning analysis.
Induced collapsed fork by treatment with 0.2 M HU and 0.03% MMS.
(CAG)70 or (CAG)130 repeat tracts.
Mutant causes partial delocalization.
Concluded to be NHEJ in Therizols et al. (2006), but a significant fraction (at least 40%) had what is now accepted as a MMEJ signature.