Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 17.
Published in final edited form as: Child Youth Serv Rev. 2016 Jan 21;62:58–64. doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2016.01.016

Table 4.

Associations between CBO attendance and outcome variables

Binary outcome variable Odds Ratio (95% CI) p-value
Weekly physical abuse 0.065 (0.015 – 0.276) <.001
Weekly emotional abuse 0.223 (0.109 – 0.459) <.001
Regular parental praise 2.363 (1.733 – 3.221) <.001
Suicidal ideation 0.764 (0.373 – 1.564) .461
Weekly domestic conflict 0.124 (0.077 – 0.199) <.001
Weekly domestic violence 0.161 (0.048 – 0.545) .003
Continuous outcome variable B (unstandardised) coefficient (95% CI) p-value
Depressive symptoms −0.325 (−0.554, −0.096) .005
Post-traumatic symptoms 0.034 (−0.092, 0.160) .597

Note. Analyses are multiple logistic regressions (for binary outcomes) or multiple linear regressions (for continuous outcomes) conducted separately for each outcome variable. For all analyses, the predictor variable was CBO attendance and the covariates were: gender, age, housing type, household employment, orphanhood, school non-enrolment, caregiver HIV status, seen someone being attacked, caring for children, caring for sick people, and household size.