Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurolinguistics. 2016 Jun 24;40:98–111. doi: 10.1016/j.jneuroling.2016.06.001

Table 3.

Mixed-effects regression models of the accuracy and RT data.

Accuracy RT
z p t p
Unimpaired adults vs. Participants with aphasia
 Intercept 13.632 <.001 12.491 <0.001
 Group −10.504 <.001 9.456 <0.001
 Sentence Type 2.383 0.017 −1.247 0.2228
 Session 0.300 0.764 1.988 0.0559
 Group * Sentence Type −0.472 0.637 −0.609 0.5466
 Group * Session −0.766 0.444 −0.065 0.9488
 Sentence Type * Session −0.370 0.711 0.09 0.9284
 Group * Sentence Type * Session 0.595 0.552 0.05 0.9604
Unimpaired adults
 Intercept n/a; at-ceiling performance 16.337 <.001
 Sentence Type −1.589 0.128
 Session 4.655 <.001
 Sentence Type * Session 0.052 0.959
Participants with aphasia
 Intercept 4.295 <0.001 8.468 <0.001
 Sentence Type 2.865 0.004 −0.739 0.472
 Session −1.252 0.211 0.763 0.461
 Sentence Type * Session 0.501 0.617 0.059 0.954

Notes: Reference levels are as follows: Group = unimpaired adults; Session = Session 1; Sentence Type = Passive.