Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 18;7:1811. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01811

Table 3.

Results of inter-coder reliability.

Pilot study
Replication
C1–C2 C1–C2 C3–C4 4C
Items Agreement 95% CI Agreement 95% CI Agreement 95% CI Agreement 95% CI
(1) Inclusion/exclusion criteria a0.684∗∗ [0.292, 1] a0.798∗∗ [0.533, 1] a0.9∗∗ [0.71, 1] a0.851∗∗ [0.707, 0.995]
(2) Methodology/design a0.252 [-0.062, 0.566] a0.861∗∗ [0.277, 1] a1∗∗ [1, 1] a0.931∗∗ [0.639, 1]
(3) Attrition b0.505 [0.078, 0.898] b0.653 [0.463, 0.962] c0.943∗∗ [0.772, 0.986] d0.79∗∗ [0.617, 0.963]
(4) Attrition between groups c0.952∗∗ [0.618, 0.994] b0.866 [0.326, 1] c0.991∗∗ [0.629, 1] d0.849∗∗ [0.478, 1]
(5) Exclusions after b-0.206 [-0.871, 0.551] b1∗∗ [0.137, 0.998] b1∗∗ [0.476, 1] d0.775∗∗ [0.306, 1]
(6) Follow-up b0.522 [-0.133, 0.802] b0.783∗∗ [0.949, 0.994] b0.963∗∗ [0.976, 0.997] d0.76∗∗ [0.5, 1]
(7) Occasions of measurement a0.486 [0.131, 0.841] a0.653∗∗ [0.32, 0.986] a1∗∗ [1, 1] a0.827∗∗ [0.66, 0.994]
(8) Pre/post measures a0.592∗∗ [0.173, 1] a0.714 [0.212, 1] a1∗∗ [1, 1] a0.73∗∗ [0.606, 0.854]
(9) Dependent variables a0.577∗∗ [0.25, 0.904] a0.512∗∗ [0.038, 0.986] a0.857∗∗ [0.588, 1] a0.745∗∗ [0.313, 1]
(10) Control techniques a0.706∗∗ [0.323, 1] a0.667 [0.104, 1] a0.744 [0.281, 1] a0.767∗∗ [0.192, 1]
(11) Construct definition a0.047 [-0.18, 0.274] a0.861∗∗ [0.277, 1] a0.77∗∗ [0.271, 1] a0.772∗∗ [0.438, 1]
(12) Imputing missing data a0.571 [0.081, 1] a0.5 [0.014, 0.986] a1∗∗ [1, 1] a0.841∗∗ [0.581, 1]

Items appear in abbreviated form; the whole and final version (after including improvements derived from the pilot study) can be found in the Appendix. C1–C2 = reliability results between coders 1 and 2; C3–C4 = reliability results between coders 3 and 4; 4C = reliability results across the four coders combined.

aCohen’s κ coefficient; bSpearman’s ρ coefficient; cPearson’s r coefficient; dKrippendorff’s α coefficient.

p < 0.05; ∗∗p < 0.01.