Table 3.
Summary of definitions and follow-up recommendations
| 1. Definitions |
| Residual/persistent disease: “presence of any radiological enhancement at 3 months radiological follow-up” |
| Radiological recurrence: “a new (after a period of non-enhancement) enhancing or growing lesion, inside or in the margin of the ablated zone” |
| 2. Multidisciplinary composition of follow-up team |
| At least 1 urologist, 1 pathologist and 1 radiologist (experienced in post-ablation imaging) |
| 3. Follow-up schedules |
| Follow-up interval: |
| Minimum FU period of 5 years, preferably extended to 10 years |
| First FU imaging at 3 months post-treatment |
| A minimum of two imaging studies in the first year |
| Biannual imaging in the second year |
| Annual imaging from the third year onwards |
| Strongly advised not to skip on the minimum recommended number of imaging studies |
| Imaging modalities |
| First option 3-phase CT scan (non-enhanced, arterial and nephrographic/cortico-medular), slice thickness ≤3 mm, IVP phase (delayed phase) advised if suspicion of urinary tract involvement or hydronephrosis |
| Second option MRI with multiparametric protocol including at least: T1, T2, DWI, DCE |
| In case of CKD 4/5 non-contrast-enhanced MRI or CEUS |
| Follow-up of metastasis |
| Annual examination for pulmonary metastasis, using CT thorax |
| Besides chest and abdomen, no other routine imaging for distant metastasis |
| 4. Biopsy |
| Only in case of suspicion of residual disease/persistence or recurrence |
| 5. Risk-adapted follow-up |
| Stage and grade are main determinants |