Skip to main content
. 2016 Oct 20;8(45):30649–30664. doi: 10.1021/acsami.6b09263

Table 2. Comparison of scFv Stabilization Strategies.

scFv stabilization strategies advantages disadvantages
(a) aggregation resistance by modifying antigen binding sites scFv stability improved by creating aggregation-resistant mutants modifying antigen binding sites is cumbersome and could potentially impact antigen binding ability
(b) modifying net antibody charge CDRs left unmodified; as such the impact on antigen binding ability is less likely to be affected requires mutation of sites along an antibody—which is a still a cumbersome method
(c) cell envelope compositions simple strategy to stabilize biomolecules (i.e., scFv), with limited to no further processing steps required—antibody fragment is left in its native cell envelope environment; can be kept intact or fragmented depending on application; could be lyophilized for long-term storage; cell surfaces allow for multiple scFvs, which provide a multivalent avidity effect for protein capture not suited to some applications where the native cell wall could interfere with the surrounding environment; potential for cell fragments to aggregate; possibility of nonspecific absorption if fragment size is not optimized; considerations of biomolecule (i.e., scFv) cell-surface heterogeneity expression needs to be undertaken