. 2016 Nov 17;17:161. doi: 10.1186/s12875-016-0556-2

Table 5.

Association of HIV diagnosis and HIV indicator conditions by gender, age group or urbanisation level

	Cases	Controls			OR^d	95% CI	P value
	n/N (%)^a	n/N (%)			OR^d	95% CI	P value
							for interaction
Total	136/224	60.7	411/2,193	18.7
Sex
Male	122/198	61.6	348/1,933	18.0	8.8	6.3 to 12.3	0.14
Female	14/26	53.8	63/260	24.2	4.3	1.8 to 10.4
Age category (at index date)
18 to 39 years	49/80	61.3	140/788	17.8	10.8	6.0 to 19.3
40 to 49 years	60/97	61.9	168/946	17.8	8.1	5.1 to 12.9	0.29
> 50 years	27/47	57.4	103/459	22.4	5.4	2.8 to 10.3
Urbanisation level^b
High urban (>2,500 addresses per km2)	42/76	55.3	117/633	18.5	7.4	4.2 to 13.0	0.49
Low urban (<2,500 addresses per km2)	58/83	69.9	201/948	21.2	9.7	5.7 to 16.2
Missing^c	36/65	55.4	103/612	16.8

^a n = number of cases or controls with HIV indicator conditions, N = total number of cases or controls, % = percentage with HIV indicator condition

^bHigh urban: >2,500 addresses per km2; low urban: < 2,500 addresses/km2

^cSubjects with missing urbanisation level were not included in the analysis

^dadditional effect of gender/age/urbanisation level on the likelihood for an HIV-diagnosis after presence of HIV indicator conditions