Table 3.
Prospective effects of high expectancies of returning to work on RTW at 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression analyses with cumulative adjustments for potential confounding factors
| Adjustment Variables | Men | Women | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR | 95% CI | Nagelkerke R 2 | OR | 95% CI | Nagelkerke R 2 | |
| No adjustment | 5.38 | 2.81–10.33 | .154 | 4.80 | 2.47–9.35 | .124 |
| + age, sociodemographic factorsa | 4.53 | 2.21–9.28 | .183 | 4.31 | 2.13–8.73 | .160 |
| + intervention groups | 4.52 | 2.19–9.32 | .191 | 4.46 | 2.18–9.12 | .181 |
| + FABQ-Work, SHC total, ODI | 4.04 | 1.86–8.76 | .333 | 3.29 | 1.55–6.97 | .280 |
| + Emotional distress (HSCL-25) | 4.11 | 1.88–8.97 | .334 | 3.36 | 1.58–7.14 | .283 |
| + Co-worker social support | 4.17 | 1.90–9.17 | .334 | b | b | b |
a Highest completed education, smoking status
b Not included
Note: Reference category = low or moderate expectancies of RTW