Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 18.
Published in final edited form as: Read Res Q. 2011 Jul 8;46(3):189–221.

Table 3.

Hierarchical Linear Model Results for Gates–MacGinitie Reading Tests (GMRTs)—Total Score, Reading Comprehension, and Reading Vocabulary Scores (extended scale scores)—Comparing Effects Between Treatment Conditions

Fixed effect GMRT's total
coefficient
p value Comprehension
coefficient
p value Vocabulary
coefficient
p value

Fitted spring score 478.11 <.001 473.97 <.001 485.04 <.001
Student
Fall score 0.81 <.001 0.76 <.001 0.74 <.001
Classroom
ISI = 1 3.40 .049 4.95 .044 0.75 .724
School FARL −0.14 <.001 −0.23 <.001 −0.14 <.001
Child × classroom interactions
Fall score × school FARL −0.001 .260 −0.001 .487 −0.001 .287

Random effects Variance p value Variance p value Variance p value

Student (r01j) 316.51 640.48 396.97
Classroom (u0j) 1.01 .180 20.88 .190 8.09 .095
Fall score (u1j) 0.01 .341

Note. FARL = free and reduced lunch. ISI = Individualizing Student Instruction. ISI classroom = 1, and the vocabulary classroom = 0. Approximate degrees of freedom for fixed effects are 30 and 444 for GMRTs’ total and vocabulary scores. Degrees of freedom for fixed effects are 30 and 31, respectively, for GMRTs’ comprehension scores. Results control for the fall score and percentage of students qualifying for the school’s FARL program. All continuous variables are grand mean centered.