Skip to main content
. 2016 Nov 18;11(11):e0166482. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0166482

Table 1. Main characteristics of all studies included in the meta-analysis.

Author Year Country Number Age Follow-up Ethnicity Cut-off value T stage Furman Tumor type Survival analysis Source of HR Multivariate analysis Treatment
Chrom 2016 Poland 266 61(22–85) 46.1(41.2–51) Caucasian ULN 45/68/109/8 13/127/71/28 mRCC OS Report yes targeted therapy
Song 2016 China 74 51.4(20.1–86.8) 38.3(2.3–53.9) Asian 1.5ULN 27/35/11/1 NR mRCC OS Report yes MT
Song 2016 China 155 55.3(17.9–86.8) 36.3(4.3–110.5) Asian 1.5ULN 48/36/11 NR mRCC OS/PFS Report yes targeted therapy
Matrana 2015 USA 88 65(34–90) 29.3(25.4–33.2) Caucasian 1.5ULN 19/42 NR mRCC PFS SC yes surgery
Fukushima 2015 Japan 92 65(37–91) 19(1–142) Asian 1.5ULN NR NR mRCC OS Report yes MT
Sasaki 2015 Japan 126 67 30.8 Asian 250U/L NR NR All stage OS Report yes MT
Bodnar 2015 Poland 58 60(41–78) NR Caucasian ULN NR NR mRCC OS Report yes targeted therapy
Kubackova 2014 Czech 836 59(21–83) NR Caucasian 1.5ULN NR NR All stage OS/PFS Report no targeted therapy
Girgis 2014 Canada 385 NR NR Caucasian NR 190/35/49/33/78(x) 31/180/103/22/49(x) Non-mRCC OS SC yes surgery
Malik 2014 USA 70 56.5(44–76) NR Caucasian 1.5ULN NR NR All stage OS Report yes MT
Poprach 2014 Czech 319 62(45–77) 15 Caucasian 1.5ULN NR NR mRCC OS/PFS Report no MT
Amato 2014 USA 57 NR NR Caucasian 1.5ULN NR 13/39(1,2–3,4) All stage OS Report yes MT
Cetin 2014 Turkey 59 60 (34–80) 15(2–59) Caucasian ULN NR NR mRCC OS Report no MT
Atkinson 2014 USA 185 Over 18 NR Caucasian 927 NR NR mRCC OS/PFS Report yes targeted therapy
Nakano 2013 Japan 36 65.7 13(2–48) Caucasian 200U/L NR NR mRCC PFS Report yes targeted therapy
Kamba 2013 Japan 144 62.9(19–86) 2–218 Caucasian 1.5ULN NR NR mRCC PFS Report yes MT
Motzer 2013 USA 1059 60(24–87) NR Caucasian 1.5ULN NR NR mRCC OS/PFS Report yes targeted therapy
Armstrong 2012 USA 404 59.4(23–86) NR Caucasian ULN NR NR mRCC OS Report yes targeted therapy
Du 2012 China 286 55.72(28–77) NR Asian 1.5ULN 165/55/52/4 17/134/112/23 mRCC OS Report yes surgery
Shinohara 2011 Japan 473 64(32–87) 18 Asian 1.5ULN NR NR mRCC OS Report yes MT
Abel 2011 USA 75 60(23–80) 15 Caucasian ULN 14/16/34/11 12/20/4/32/7(Ⅱ/Ⅲ/Ⅳ/unknown/high grade) mRCC OS Report yes targeted therapy
Zhang 2011 China 83 51(27–75) 27(12–46) Asian 315IU/L NR NR mRCC PFS Report yes targeted therapy
Aben 2011 Netherlands 328 67.6±11 NR Caucasian 1.5ULN NR 14/32/43/13/226 (uknown) mRCC OS Report yes MT
Richey 2011 USA 188 60.8(18.2–83.9) 13.1(1.0–64.4) Caucasian ULN 45/28/89/26 NR mRCC OS Report yes targeted therapy
Jeppesen 2010 Denmark 120 58.3(29–73) 48–72 Caucasian 1.5ULN NR NR mRCC OS Report yes MT
Donskov 2006 Denmark 120 57(19–74) 57(32–73) Caucasian 1.5ULN NR NR mRCC OS Report yes targeted therapy
Peccatori 2005 Italy 70 NR 10 Caucasian 300U/L NR NR All stage OS Report yes surgery
Lehmann 2004 Germany 48 63(35–82) 125.3(33.4–156) Caucasian 183U/L 44761 NR Non-mRCC OS Report no surgery
Atzpodien 2002 Germany 425 NR 20(0–157) Caucasian 220U/L NR NR mRCC OS Report yes MT

Abbreviation: RCC renal cell carcinoma, mRCC metastatic renal cell carcinoma, Non-mRCC non- metastatic renal cell carcinoma, OS overall survival, PFS progression-free survival, HR hazard ratio, NR not report, MT multiple therapy, SC survival curve, ULN upper limits of normal, x status unknown.