Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 24.
Published in final edited form as: Biometrics. 2016 May 18;73(1):134–144. doi: 10.1111/biom.12542

Table 2.

Analysis of SRTR data: Estimating the effect of liver transplantation on the transplanted (with 95% confidence interval in parentheses), by MELD score at transplant.

MELD Score δ̂(1) δ̂(3) δ̂(5) Δ̂(5)
6–8 −0.03
(−0.05, −0.01)
0.03
(−0.01, 0.05)
0.11
(0.07, 0.15)
0.11
(−0.03, 0.25)
9–11 −0.02
(−0.04, 0.00)
0.09
(0.07, 0.11)
0.17
(0.15, 0.19)
0.29
(0.15, 0.43)
12–14 0.02
(0.00, 0.04)
0.16
(0.12, 0.20)
0.23
(0.19, 0.27)
0.59
(0.43, 0.75)
15–17 0.09
(0.07, 0.11)
0.26
(0.22, 0.30)
0.32
(0.28, 0.36)
1.00
(0.80, 1.20)
18–19 0.15
(0.13, 0.17)
0.26
(0.24, 0.28)
0.27
(0.23, 0.31)
1.06
(0.90, 1.22)
20–22 0.19
(0.15, 0.23)
0.29
(0.23, 0.35)
0.30
(0.24, 0.36)
1.23
(0.95, 1.41)
23–25 0.19
(0.15, 0.23)
0.23
(0.19, 0.27)
0.26
(0.18, 0.34)
1.07
(0.79, 1.35)
26–29 0.25
(0.17, 0.33)
0.19
(0.11, 0.27)
0.16
(0.06, 0.26)
0.99
(0.59, 1.39)
30–35 0.33
(0.25, 0.41)
0.27
(0.07, 0.47)
0.25
(0.01, 0.49)
1.45
(0.05, 2.85)
36–40 0.48
(0.40, 0.56)
0.48
(0.36, 0.60)
0.45
(0.33, 0.57)
2.38
(1.70, 3.06)

δ̂(t) and Δ̂(L) are as defined in (24) and (25), respectively. The time scale represents years post-transplant.