Table 4.
Studies | P Q | I 2 (%) | OR | 95% CI | P Z |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
f versus F | |||||
Zhong et al. | 0.186 | 35.3 | 1.492 | 1.227~1.814 | <0.001 |
Hou et al. | 0.097 | 49.2 | 1.539 | 1.269~1.866 | <0.001 |
Wu et al. | 0.061 | 55.6 | 1.570 | 1.173~2.101 | 0.002∗ |
Bućan et al. | 0.137 | 42.6 | 1.661 | 1.388~1.987 | <0.001 |
Cyganek et al. | 0.291 | 19.5 | 1.785 | 1.461~2.180 | <0.001 |
Taverna et al. | 0.057 | 56.4 | 1.611 | 1.171~2.217 | 0.003∗ |
| |||||
ff + Ff versus FF | |||||
Zhong et al. | 0.177 | 36.7 | 1.770 | 1.282~2.443 | 0.001 |
Hou et al. | 0.061 | 55.7 | 1.974 | 1.185~3.287 | 0.009∗ |
Wu et al. | 0.155 | 40.0 | 1.832 | 1.344~2.497 | <0.001 |
Bućan et al. | 0.151 | 40.5 | 2.102 | 1.552~2.846 | <0.001 |
Cyganek et al. | 0.172 | 37.4 | 2.301 | 1.641~3.227 | <0.001 |
Taverna et al. | 0.059 | 56.0 | 2.066 | 1.159~3.681 | 0.014 |
| |||||
ff versus Ff + FF | |||||
Zhong et al. | 0.512 | 0.0 | 1.697 | 1.244~2.313 | 0.001 |
Hou et al. | 0.258 | 24.6 | 1.765 | 1.263~2.466 | 0.001 |
Wu et al. | 0.212 | 31.5 | 1.866 | 1.382~2.521 | <0.001 |
Bućan et al. | 0.283 | 20.7 | 1.942 | 1.455~2.592 | <0.001 |
Cyganek et al. | 0.573 | 0.0 | 2.152 | 1.561~2.968 | <0.001 |
Taverna et al. | 0.217 | 30.7 | 1.933 | 1.420~2.630 | <0.001 |
| |||||
ff versus FF | |||||
Zhong et al. | 0.201 | 33.0 | 2.145 | 1.425~3.228 | <0.001 |
Hou et al. | 0.028 | 63.2 | 2.616 | 1.267~5.401 | 0.009∗ |
Wu et al. | 0.058 | 56.1 | 2.372 | 1.263~4.456 | 0.007∗ |
Bućan et al. | 0.066 | 54.7 | 2.999 | 1.665~5.401 | <0.001∗ |
Cyganek et al. | 0.141 | 42.1 | 3.265 | 2.122~5.023 | <0.001 |
Taverna et al. | 0.029 | 63.0 | 2.765 | 1.306~5.856 | 0.008∗ |
∗Calculated with random-effect model.