Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Neurosurg. 2016 May 20;126(3):811–818. doi: 10.3171/2016.1.JNS152028

TABLE 3.

Correlation between clipping and primary outcome measures

Model 1-Yr Mortality*
30-Day Mortality*
Mortality
OR (95% CI) p Value OR (95% CI) p Value HR (95% CI) p Value
Crude 0.76 (0.63–0.92) 0.005 0.86 (0.64–1.17) 0.338 0.77 (0.64–0.93) 0.005

Multivariable regression 1.05 (0.86–1.29) 0.630 1.26 (0.91–1.74) 0.156 1.05 (0.87–1.27) 0.621

Propensity score adjustment 1.04 (0.86–1.28) 0.654 1.28 (0.93–1.76) 0.135 1.05 (0.87–1.28) 0.602

IPW 0.98 (0.84–1.13) 0.739 1.18 (0.93–1.50) 0.174 0.99 (0.87–1.14) 0.960

IV analysis§ 1.26 (0.68–2.31) 0.461 1.65 (0.68–3.96) 0.260 1.28 (0.58–2.85) 0.538
*

Analyses based on logistic regression.

Time to event; analyses based on a Cox proportional-hazards model (limited to 1-year follow-up).

Mixed effects; includes patient’s HRR as a random effect variable.

§

Hospital referral region coiling rate (fraction of coiling of total procedures performed) was used as an instrument of choice of treatment.