Table 12.
Ratios of Mean Downwind and Upwind Pollutant Concentrations by Terminal
Terminala | EC | OC | PM2.5 | Butadiene | Benzene | Formaldehyde | Acetaldehyde |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oklahoma City (23) | 0.29 | 0.57 | 0.37 | ||||
Columbus (24) | 0.42 | 0.64 | 1.35 | 0.86 | 0.66 | 2.33 | |
Milwaukee (25) | 1.09 | 1.02 | 0.78 | 0.88 | 1.00 | 0.93 | 1.26 |
Memphis (26) | 1.14 | 1.22 | 1.23 | 0.85 | 0.71 | 1.84 | |
Phoenix (27) | 0.80 | 1.25 | — | 0.72 | 2.67 | 1.88 | |
Portland (28) | — | 0.98 | 1.17 | 0.76 | 1.05 | 1.90 | |
Denver (29) | 1.58 | 1.18 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.34 | 1.06 | |
Miami (30) | 0.94 | 1.07 | 0.52 | 1.13 | |||
Hagerstown (31) | 0.93 | 1.40 | 1.58 | 0.71 | 0.82 | 0.65 | 0.58 |
Nashville (32) | 0.72 | 0.82 | 0.64 | 1.11 | 0.84 | 0.98 | 0.94 |
Middletown (33) | 0.93 | 0.84 | 1.53 | 0.56 | 1.11 | 1.16 | 1.36 |
Laredo (35) | 1.20 | 0.92 | 1.10 | 0.89 | 1.01 | ||
Philadelphia (36) | 1.12 | 1.17 | 1.03 | 1.39 | 1.76 | 1.25 | 0.93 |
Repeat-Visit Terminals | |||||||
Philadelphia (37) | 1.31 | 1.21 | 1.12 | 3.22 | 2.25 | 1.42 | 1.11 |
Columbus (38) | 0.55 | 0.88 | 0.79 | 0.47 | 0.74 | 0.78 | 0.85 |
Milwaukee (39) | 1.50 | 1.39 | 1.25 | ||||
Phoenix (40) | 1.08 | 0.88 | 1.18 | 0.91 | 0.82 | 0.84 | 0.80 |
Denver (42) | 2.93 | 1.07 | 1.20 | 1.18 | 1.63 | 1.11 | 0.68 |
All Visitsb | |||||||
Mean | 1.03 | 1.03 | 1.02 | 1.13 | 1.10 | 1.11 | 1.25 |
SD | 0.62 | 0.23 | 0.42 | 0.79 | 0.44 | 0.51 | 0.54 |
Median | 1.01 | 1.04 | 1.14 | 0.90 | 0.93 | 1.01 | 1.08 |
Repeat Visitsc | |||||||
Mean | 1.47 | 1.09 | 1.11 | 1.45 | 1.36 | 1.04 | 0.86 |
SD | 0.89 | 0.22 | 0.19 | 1.22 | 0.72 | 0.29 | 0.18 |
Median | 1.31 | 1.07 | 1.18 | 1.04 | 1.22 | 0.98 | 0.82 |
Number indicates the order in which the terminals were visited. Visits 1–21 were part of the NCI-funded study. No ratios are provided for Elizabeth (22), Houston (34), and Portland (41) because of sampler failures.
Ratios for all visits to terminals for which there were data.
Ratios for 6 repeat visits to terminals for which there were data. Portland visit (41) contributed no data for ratios because the downwind samples failed.