Skip to main content
. 2016 Sep;28(3):123–130.

Table 3.

Secondary Outcomes, According to Intervention Group and Type of Severe Acute Malnutrition.*

Secondary Outcome Amoxicillin Cefdinir Placebo Total
Overall
Time to recovery
No. of children 820 839 783
No. of days 30±19 29±19 30±19 29±19
Weight
No. of children 883 897 873
Gain (g/kg/day) 3.4±4.0 3.9±6.3 3.1±4.1 3.5±4.9
Length
No. of children 883 897 873
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.20±0.45 0.22±0.44 0.18±0.44 0.20±0.44
Mid-upper-arm circumference
No. of children 878 888 866
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.27±0.42 0.28±0.42 0.22±0.41 0.26±0.42
Kwashiorkor
Time to recovery
No. of children 610 632 583
No. of days 26±16 27±18 27±17 27±17
Weight
No. of children 636 649 614
Gain (g/kg/day) 2.7±3.4 3.2±6.7** 2.5±3.4** 2.8±4.8
Length
No. of children 636 649 614
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.21±0.48 0.24±0.47 0.20±0.48 0.22±0.48
Mid-upper-arm circumference
No. of children 633 642 609
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.26±0.45†† 0.26±0.42‡‡ 0.21±0.42††‡‡ 0.25±0.43
Marasmic kwashiorkor
Time to recovery
No. of children 54 51 55
No. of days 44±21 39±17 40±18 41±19
Weight
No. of children 65 67 76
Gain (g/kg/day) 4.1±3.4 4.9±4.3 3.6±5.1 4.2±4.4
Length
No. of children 65 67 76
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.17±0.38 0.15±0.26 0.13±0.30 0.15±0.32
Mid-upper-arm circumference
No. of children 63 66 75
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.22±0.33 0.34±0.42‡‡ 0.19±0.37‡‡ 0.25±0.38
Marasmus
Time to recovery
No. of children 156 156 145
No. of days 37±23 35±21 38±23 37±22
Weight
No. of children 182 181 183
Gain (g/kg/day) 5.6±5.3 6.0±4.7‡‡ 4.9±5.0‡‡ 5.5±5.1
Length
No. of children 182 181 183
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.15±0.33 0.21±0.35 0.16±0.32 0.17±0.34
Mid-upper-arm circumference
No. of children 182 180 182
Gain (mm/day)§ 0.32±0.37 0.34±0.41 0.28±0.38 0.31±0.39
*

Plus.minus values are means ±SD. P>0.05 for all pairwise comparisons, except as noted.

Weight gain was calculated from enrollment to the second follow-up visit (or to the first follow-up visit for children who had recovered by the time of the first follow-up visit or did not return for a second follow-up visit).

P = 0.002 for the comparison of placebo with cefdinir.

§

Gains in length and mid-upper-arm circumference were calculated from enrollment until the final study visit.

P = 0.01 for the comparison of placebo with amoxicillin.

P = 0.002 for the comparison of placebo with cefdinir.

**

P = 0.02 for the comparison of placebo with cefdinir.

††

P = 0.04 for the comparison of placebo with amoxicillin.

‡‡

P = 0.03 for the comparison of placebo with cefdinir.