Skip to main content
. 2016 Feb 10;2(1):e000080. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000080

Table 1.

Participant details, visual function and shooting scores

Age Sex Years competing Vision
Hearing
Score (standing)
Score (prone)
Athlete DVA NVA CS VF 4FA LOD Qualifying Final Qualifying Final
1 50 M 20 0.24 0.26 1.05 33.19 8.7 40 558 DNQ DNC DNC
2 65 F 4 0.82 0.92 0.45 19.78 12.5 30 563 198.5 584 143.1
3 31 M 8 1.02 0.72 0.60 16.72 2.5 15 562 70.0 594 165.1
4 63 M 5 1.52 0.68 0.45 8.66 17.5 35 581 158.2 600 210.4
5 45 M 9 1.64 1.22 0.15 19.19 10.0 25 578 115.6 600 209.1
6 42 M 9 1.80 1.18 0.15 32.58 16.2 25 547 DNQ DNC DNC
7 51 F 2 2.20 1.10 0.00 27.68 11.2 15 577 198.2 579 83.6
8 29 M 17 PL PL NM NM 3.7 10 586 137.0 DNC DNC
9 37 F 25 NPL NPL NM NM 8.7 20 582 178.0 599 185.9
10 37 M 13 NPL NPL NM NM 4.0 45 576 95.5 577 123.1

CS, monocular contrast sensitivity in the shooting eye (logCS); DNC, did not compete; DNQ, did not qualify; DVA, monocular distance visual acuity in the shooting eye (logMAR); F, female; 4FA, pure tone audiometry threshold averaged across four octave frequencies 500 Hz–4 kHz (dBHL); LOD, largest difference in hearing thresholds between neighbouring octaves (dB); M, male; NM, not measurable; NPL, no perception of light; NVA, monocular near visual acuity in the shooting eye (logMAR); PL, perception of light; VF, visual field mean defect in the shooting eye.