Skip to main content
. 2016 Mar 3;2(1):e000098. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2015-000098

Table 1.

Outcome measurements of the NURSE-RCT and other data for methods development

Domain Measurement
Primary outcome
Body structure and functions
 Low back pain Pain intensity: visual analogue scale 0–100 mm during the past month*
Secondary outcomes
 Musculoskeletal pain
  • Pain intensity: Numeric Rating Scale 0–10 during the past 4 weeks; assessed for low back, upper back, neck, shoulder, knee, hip

  • Pain frequency of each above site: daily, most days but not daily, now and then*

 Musculoskeletal exertion†
  • Perceived exertion after typical working day: Numeric Rating Scale

  • 1–5; assessed for low back, upper back, neck, shoulder, knee, hip*

 Sleep and recovery from work† Tiredness in the morning, tiredness during the day, sleepiness during the day, recovery after work: Numeric Rating Scale 1–5*
 Mental well-being Beck Depression Inventory (9 items)*‡
Activity limitations
 Movement control dysfunction MCI test battery*
 Motor skill: static balance§ One-leg stand
 Motor skill: gross movement timing§ Rhythm coordination test*
 Range of motion: trunk§ Trunk side-bending*
 Range of motion: upper-body§ Shoulder neck mobility*
 Muscular fitness: trunk§ Dynamic sit-ups
 Body composition Weight, height, body mass index
 Motor skill: agility§ Running figure of 8 functional fitness test*
 Muscular fitness: upper-body and trunk§ Modified push-ups; functional fitness test*
 Muscular fitness: leg power§ Vertical jump; functional fitness test*
 Muscular fitness: leg strength§ One-leg squat (forward); functional fitness test*
 Aerobic fitness: walking 6 min walk test; functional fitness test
 Limitations in self-reported activities Patient specific functional scale
Participation
 Physical activity and sedentary behaviour Objective assessment with accelerometer for 7 days (Hookie AM20 tri-axial accelerometer, Traxmeet, Espoo, Finland)
 Physical activity and exercise diary Recorded for the 7 days when using the accelerometer
 Physical activity recommendation¶ Standard Finnish Questionnaire assessing the fulfilment of current recommendation for weekly physical activity
 Health-related quality of life Rand 36-item health survey questionnaire
 Self-reported work ability† WAI: four standard questions
Environmental factors
 Psychosocial factors at work† Selected items of a Finnish questionnaire*
Individual factors
 Fear avoidance** Fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire*
Methods development
Body structure and functioning
 Functioning of the autonomic nervous system (substudies 1 and 2) Measurements of heart-rate variability during two working days and one leisure day
Activity limitations
 Physical functioning in nursing tasks Ability to manage with heavy, task specific nursing duties including patient transfer: Numeric Rating Scale 0–10 with 21 selection points*‡
 Motion analysis (substudy 3) IMU system (Valedo Research, Hocoma AG, Volketswil, Switzerland)††

*Assessment of test-retest repeatability.

†Standard questionnaire developed by the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health, Finland.

‡Assessment of construct validity.

§Standard method developed by the UKK Institute, Tampere, Finland.

¶Standard method developed by the UKK Institute and National Institute of Health and Well-being, Finland.

**Finnish version, translated and validated by Orton, Helsinki, Finland.

††Assessment of validity of IMU to detect MCIs and their changes.

IMU, inertial measurement unit; MCI, movement control impairment; NURSE-RCT, prevention of chronic low back pain in female nurses; WAI, Work Ability Index.