Table 5.
Comparison of the previously reconstructed models [21] with the new models produced by CoReCo in this article
| CoReCo model | T. reesei | S. cerevisiae | Average of all modelsa | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pitkänen [21] (%) | This article (%) | Pitkänen [21] (%) | This article (%) | Pitkänen 21] (%) | This article (%) | |
| Dead end reactions | 58 | 44 | 61 | 44 | 59 | 44 |
| Dead end metabolites | 68 | 59 | 70 | 58 | 69 | 58 |
| Reactions added during the gap-filling step | 37 | 20 | 35 | 22 | 39 | 21 |
| Biomass components produced | 7 | 100 | 7 | 100 | 7 | 89 |
| Biomass components produced* | 98* | 100 | 100* | 100 | 91* | 89 |
| Biomass components produced with stoichiometrically unrealistic yield | 98* | 0 | 64* | 0 | 85* | 0 |
* When eight extra compounds were added as a source metabolites into the model simulations
a The obligate intracellular parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi has been excluded from the averages