Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 21.
Published in final edited form as: Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May 6;34(5):466–470. doi: 10.1038/nbt.3545

Table 1.

Preconception Carrier Screening Prenatal Including PGD & NIPT Newborn Screening Suspected Rare Disease Oncology and Tumor Profiling Common Disease Pharmacogenomics
Test Purpose Risk assessment Risk assessment and diagnosis Therapeutic intervention, risk assessment, disease monitoring Diagnosis, therapeutic intervention Risk assessment, diagnosis, (individualized) therapeutic intervention Risk assessment, diagnosis, disease monitoring, therapeutic intervention Individualized therapeutic intervention
Example Tests Panels that include cystic fibrosis, fragile X syndrome, sickle cell disease Panels that include trisomies 13, 18, 21, and microdeletions Cystic fibrosis Whole genome sequencing (WGS) and whole exome sequencing (WES) Comprehensive genomic profiling in NSCLC Panel test for cardiovascular disease and diabetes risks Panel tests for response to abacavir, warfarin, and carbamazepine
Possible Negative Consequences Increased confusion and unwarranted anxiety (given variable penetrance, VUSs, especially with expanded panels) Mistaken reliance on NIPT as diagnostic leads to terminations of unaffected fetuses; tests enter clinic without established PPVs Newborn screening panels rapidly expand beyond AAP and ACMG recommendations; increased anxiety, confusion, and waste of resources Patients and providers burdened with costs as payers refuse to cover, citing lack of evidence of clinical validity Poor quality tests and unresolved technical challenges affecting tests lead to patient harm from therapeutic mismatches Patients seek out interventions without established benefit, possibly with associated risks Testing is costly but not does not lead to improved outcomes over standard of care
Possible Positive Consequences Expanded screening lowers disease burden NIPT as initial screen reduces exposure to risks of CVS and amniocentesis; expanded screening lowers disease burden Appropriate expansion of newborn screening leads to improved outcomes Catalyst for coverage policy innovation; leads to more effective therapeutic approaches, or precision medicine Leads to more effective therapeutic approaches, or precision medicine Patients are able to access effective interventions earlier, preventing disease or slowing disease progression Ensures delivery of effective therapeutics and avoidance of toxicities, or precision medicine

NSCLC: non-small cell lung cancer, VUS: variant of uncertain significance, NIPT: non-invasive prenatal testing, PPV: positive predictive value, AAP: American Academy of Pediatrics, ACMG: American College of Medical Genetics, CVS: chorionic villus sampling