Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2017 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: J Nurs Adm. 2016 Nov;46(11):605–612. doi: 10.1097/NNA.0000000000000412

Table 1.

Characteristics of Study Hospitals by Nurse Engagement Level (N=425 hospitals)

Characteristic, n (%)* Overall Least
Engaged
n=13
Somewhat
engaged
n=80
Moderately
engaged
n=155
Most
engaged
n=177
Pa
Large (>250 beds) 202 (48%) 4 (31%) 29 (36%) 79 (51%) 90 (51%) 0.184
Non-teaching 219 (52%) 5 (38%) 36 (45%) 80 (52%) 98 (55%) <0.05
High technology 208 (49%) 2 (15%) 41 (51%) 71 (46%) 94 (53%) <0.05
Rural location 35 (8%) 2 (15%) 8 (10%) 9 (6%) 16 (9%) 0.463
Nonprofit 344 (81%) 8 (62%) 50 (63%) 118 (76%) 168 (95%) <0.001
Magnet®-recognizedb 46 (11%) 0 0 10 (22%) 36 (78%) <0.001
Stateb <0.001
  California 180 (42%) 1 (0.6%) 28 (16%) 57 (32%) 94 (52%)
  Florida 109 (26%) 9 (8%) 32 (29%) 41 (38%) 27 (25%)
  New Jersey 40 (9%) 1 (2%) 1 (2%) 21 (53%) 17 (43%)
  Pennsylvania 96 (23%) 2 (2%) 19 (20%) 36 (38%) 39 (41%)
Nurse staffing, mean (SD) 5.3 (1.4) 6.3 (1.8) 5.6 (1.5) 5.5 (1.3) 4.8 (1.2) <0.001
a

P values generated from χ 2 for categorical variables, and from F-test (analysis of variance) for the continuous staffing variable.

b

Row percentages